Comment on “A study on calibration methods of noise annoyance data from listening tests” [J. Acoust. Soc. Am. <b>156</b>, 1877–1886 (2024)] (L)
The primary purpose of this letter is to offer historical clarification on the development of a model for "psychoacoustic annoyance" as cited by Di, Chen, Li, and Li [J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 156(3), 1877-1886 (2024)], to raise awareness of its origin and propose a more appropriate attribution. A secondary aspect concerns the notions of noise annoyance advanced by Di, Chen, Li, and Li [J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 156(3), 1877-1886 (2024)], addressing associated semantic and conceptual matters, with the aim of stimulating debate and in the hope of advancing towards future consensus.
Authors
- Antonio J. Torija (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5915-3736)
- Michael J. B. Lotinga (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9243-9453)
Institutions
- University of Salford (GB)
Publication Details
- Journal
- The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
- Published
- 2025-05-01
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1121/10.0036561
- Citations
- 2
- Primary Topic
- Noise Effects and Management
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 6.24