A Comparative Study of finite Difference and Galerkin Finite Element Methods for Solving Boundary Value Problems

Many applications in engineering cannot be solved analytically, major difficulty in the study of partial differential equations is that it is often impossible to obtain analytical solutions. Therefore, various numerical methods for solving partial differential equations have been proposed by related researchers, such as the finite difference method (FDM), finite element method (FEM), finite volume method (FVM), etc. The earliest is the FDM, which approximates the differential equations by using a local Taylor expansion. The finite element method (FEM) is a numerical technique for solving problems which are described by partial differential equations or can be formulated as functional minimization. A domain of interest is represented as an assembly of finite elements.This paper presents a qualitative comparative study of FDM and Galerkin finite element method (GFEM) to show the advantages and disadvantages of these methods in solving boundary value problems. Several numerical experiments conducted for comparisons purpose. The results reveal that the GFEM is an alternative method for solving several types of boundary value problems.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Journal of Pure and Applied Mathematics
Published
2025-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.29020/nybg.ejpam.v18i2.5895
Primary Topic
Advanced Numerical Methods in Computational Mathematics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Comparative Study of finite Difference and Galerkin Finite Element Methods for Solving Boundary Value Problems

Abdulkafi Mohammed Saeed, Shahad Saleh Ayad Almutairi
European Journal of Pure and Applied Mathematics
Advanced Numerical Methods in Computational Mathematics
article

A Comparative Study of finite Difference and Galerkin Finite Element Methods for Solving Boundary Value Problems

Abdulkafi Mohammed Saeed, Shahad Saleh Ayad Almutairi
article en

Abstract

Many applications in engineering cannot be solved analytically, major difficulty in the study of partial differential equations is that it is often impossible to obtain analytical solutions. Therefore, various numerical methods for solving partial differential equations have been proposed by related researchers, such as the finite difference method (FDM), finite element method (FEM), finite volume method (FVM), etc. The earliest is the FDM, which approximates the differential equations by using a local Taylor expansion. The finite element method (FEM) is a numerical technique for solving problems which are described by partial differential equations or can be formulated as functional minimization. A domain of interest is represented as an assembly of finite elements.This paper presents a qualitative comparative study of FDM and Galerkin finite element method (GFEM) to show the advantages and disadvantages of these methods in solving boundary value problems. Several numerical experiments conducted for comparisons purpose. The results reveal that the GFEM is an alternative method for solving several types of boundary value problems.

European Journal of Pure and Applied MathematicsVol. 18(2)
Qassim University (SA)
Qassim University
Openalex Percentile: Top 90%
Advanced Numerical Methods in Computational Mathematics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

A Comparative Study of finite Difference and Galerkin Finite Element Methods for Solving Boundary Value Problems — Abdulkafi Mohammed Saeed, Shahad Saleh Ayad Almutairi · European Journal of Pure and Applied Mathematics (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS