Non-Performing Loans and Bank Performance: Does Institutional Quality Matter?

This study investigates how bank non-performing loans (NPL) affect bank performance and the role of institutional quality in mitigating this impact. Employing ASEAN commercial bank data from 2011 to 2022, we employ panel fixed effects as our main regression method and adopt a stochastic frontier analysis and measure bank performance using bank efficiency. We find that NPL negatively influence bank performance. Furthermore, among institutional quality indicators, regulatory quality, corruption control, and voice and accountability have significant positive effects on bank performance, particularly on Return on Asset (ROA). However, the results of interaction model reveal that corruption control, voice and accountability, and rule of law moderate the negative impact of NPL on bank performance.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Economics and Management
Published
2025-04-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.47836/ijeam.19.1.06
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Banking stability, regulation, efficiency
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.21

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Non-Performing Loans and Bank Performance: Does Institutional Quality Matter?

Bruno S. Sergi, Etikah Karyani, Alfitman Alfitman, Fadli Septianto et al.
1 citations
International Journal of Economics and Management
Banking stability, regulation, efficiency
2.21
article

Non-Performing Loans and Bank Performance: Does Institutional Quality Matter?

Bruno S. Sergi, Etikah Karyani, Alfitman Alfitman, Fadli Septianto, Irwan Trinugroho, Ahmad Salim, Mamduh M. Hanafi
article en
1 citations

Abstract

This study investigates how bank non-performing loans (NPL) affect bank performance and the role of institutional quality in mitigating this impact. Employing ASEAN commercial bank data from 2011 to 2022, we employ panel fixed effects as our main regression method and adopt a stochastic frontier analysis and measure bank performance using bank efficiency. We find that NPL negatively influence bank performance. Furthermore, among institutional quality indicators, regulatory quality, corruption control, and voice and accountability have significant positive effects on bank performance, particularly on Return on Asset (ROA). However, the results of interaction model reveal that corruption control, voice and accountability, and rule of law moderate the negative impact of NPL on bank performance.

International Journal of Economics and ManagementVol. 19(19)
Sebelas Maret University (ID), Universitas Gadjah Mada (ID), Harvard University Press (US), Sultan Agung Islamic University (ID), Andalas University (ID)
Universitas Sebelas Maret
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Banking stability, regulation, efficiency
2.21
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.