Accountability in Zakat Institutions: A Bibliometric Analysis and Systematic Literature Review

This study conducted a bibliometric analysis and systematic literature review (SLR) of scholarly literature on accountability in Zakat institutions, identifying future research directions. Data were retrieved from the Scopus and Web of Science (WoS) databases and limited to articles. Analysis was performed using VOSviewer and content analysis. The number of articles on accountability issues in zakat institutions compared to zakat literature is limited, with Indonesia and Malaysia being the most productive countries and England the most influential. Research on accountability in zakat institutions is categorised into four clusters, with varied practices observed. Accountability is primarily understood through perspectives of accounting, reporting, and disclosure, as well as dual accountability to God and humans and quantitative survey approaches. This analysis reveals the need for further research on accountability in the context of zakat institutions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Economics and Management
Published
2025-04-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.47836/ijeam.19.1.03
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Islamic Finance and Banking Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
7.82
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Accountability in Zakat Institutions: A Bibliometric Analysis and Systematic Literature Review

Anis Chariri, Ahmad Baehaqi, Tri Jatmiko Wahyu Prabowo
2 citations
International Journal of Economics and Management
Islamic Finance and Banking Studies
7.82
article

Accountability in Zakat Institutions: A Bibliometric Analysis and Systematic Literature Review

Anis Chariri, Ahmad Baehaqi, Tri Jatmiko Wahyu Prabowo
article en
2 citations

Abstract

This study conducted a bibliometric analysis and systematic literature review (SLR) of scholarly literature on accountability in Zakat institutions, identifying future research directions. Data were retrieved from the Scopus and Web of Science (WoS) databases and limited to articles. Analysis was performed using VOSviewer and content analysis. The number of articles on accountability issues in zakat institutions compared to zakat literature is limited, with Indonesia and Malaysia being the most productive countries and England the most influential. Research on accountability in zakat institutions is categorised into four clusters, with varied practices observed. Accountability is primarily understood through perspectives of accounting, reporting, and disclosure, as well as dual accountability to God and humans and quantitative survey approaches. This analysis reveals the need for further research on accountability in the context of zakat institutions.

International Journal of Economics and ManagementVol. 19(19)
Diponegoro University (ID)
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Islamic Finance and Banking Studies
7.82
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Accountability in Zakat Institutions: A Bibliometric Analysis and Systematic Literature Review — Anis Chariri, Ahmad Baehaqi, et al. · International Journal of Economics and Management (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS