Improved Strategy for Virtual Daily Light Integral with CO2 Supplementation in Greenhouses

Supplemental CO 2 in greenhouses can reduce the lighting required to achieve a particular yield. Systems that can also control deployable shades are very desirable for light-sensitive crops such as lettuce, which is susceptible to leaf tipburn if exposed to excess light. Four lighting control systems are compared: 1) a rule-based light and shade controller baseline; 2) a trajectory-following light and shade controller; 3) a rule-based light, shading, and CO 2 controller; and 4) a new trajectory-following light, shade, and CO 2 controller that combines the strengths of controllers 2 and 3. The primary metric used for comparison is revenue less costs for CO 2 and lighting. Differences in this metric indicate relative performance of one control system compared with another. Simulations using four different, contiguous US climates are performed, all indicating nearly twice as much improvement with the new controller over the baseline as using controller 2 or 3 alone.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
HortTechnology
Published
2025-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.21273/horttech05605-25
Primary Topic
Greenhouse Technology and Climate Control
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Improved Strategy for Virtual Daily Light Integral with CO2 Supplementation in Greenhouses

Kale Harbick
HortTechnology
Greenhouse Technology and Climate Control
article

Improved Strategy for Virtual Daily Light Integral with CO2 Supplementation in Greenhouses

Kale Harbick
article en

Abstract

Supplemental CO 2 in greenhouses can reduce the lighting required to achieve a particular yield. Systems that can also control deployable shades are very desirable for light-sensitive crops such as lettuce, which is susceptible to leaf tipburn if exposed to excess light. Four lighting control systems are compared: 1) a rule-based light and shade controller baseline; 2) a trajectory-following light and shade controller; 3) a rule-based light, shading, and CO 2 controller; and 4) a new trajectory-following light, shade, and CO 2 controller that combines the strengths of controllers 2 and 3. The primary metric used for comparison is revenue less costs for CO 2 and lighting. Differences in this metric indicate relative performance of one control system compared with another. Simulations using four different, contiguous US climates are performed, all indicating nearly twice as much improvement with the new controller over the baseline as using controller 2 or 3 alone.

HortTechnologyVol. 35(3)
Agricultural Research Service (US), United States Department of Agriculture (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 94%
Greenhouse Technology and Climate Control
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Improved Strategy for Virtual Daily Light Integral with CO2 Supplementation in Greenhouses — Kale Harbick · HortTechnology (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS