Dermal Exposure of Operators, Bystanders and Residents Derived from Unmanned Aerial Spraying Systems (UASS) in Vineyard

The increasing adoption of unmanned aerial spraying services presents a transformative opportunity for precision agriculture, enabling targeted and efficient application of plant protection products. However, ensuring their safe and regulated integration into European farming requires a comprehensive understanding of exposure risks for operators, bystanders, and residents. Expanding scientific knowledge in this domain is crucial for establishing a dedicated risk assessment framework for unmanned aerial spraying applications. This study evaluates dermal exposure levels among operators, residents, and bystanders, comparing unmanned aerial spraying applications with conventional vehicle-based and manual handheld spraying methods based on existing risk assessment and exposure models. Results suggest that unmanned aerial sprayers reduce dermal exposure for pilots, residents, and bystanders due to their remote operation and reduced drift compared to conventional spraying methods. However, critical exposure points arise during mixing, loading, and auxiliary tasks, where dermal exposure levels exceed model estimates. These elevated exposure levels are attributed to the higher frequency and concentrated handling of plant protection products in unmanned aerial spraying operations compared to traditional spraying methods. These findings highlight the need for targeted risk mitigation strategies to enhance operator safety, such as implementing closed transfer systems, optimized handling protocols, and specialized protective equipment.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Drones
Published
2025-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/drones9050345
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Pesticide Exposure and Toxicity
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.50

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Dermal Exposure of Operators, Bystanders and Residents Derived from Unmanned Aerial Spraying Systems (UASS) in Vineyard

Miguelina Mateo-Miranda, José Luis Alonso‐Prados, M. Márquez, Jorge Martínez-Guanter et al.
2 citations
Drones
Pesticide Exposure and Toxicity
3.50
article

Dermal Exposure of Operators, Bystanders and Residents Derived from Unmanned Aerial Spraying Systems (UASS) in Vineyard

Miguelina Mateo-Miranda, José Luis Alonso‐Prados, M. Márquez, Jorge Martínez-Guanter, Luis Sánchez-Fernández, Pilar Sandín‐España, Manuel Pérez Ruiz, Isaac Abril-Muñoz, Francisco Díaz-García, Esther García-Montero
article en
2 citations

Abstract

The increasing adoption of unmanned aerial spraying services presents a transformative opportunity for precision agriculture, enabling targeted and efficient application of plant protection products. However, ensuring their safe and regulated integration into European farming requires a comprehensive understanding of exposure risks for operators, bystanders, and residents. Expanding scientific knowledge in this domain is crucial for establishing a dedicated risk assessment framework for unmanned aerial spraying applications. This study evaluates dermal exposure levels among operators, residents, and bystanders, comparing unmanned aerial spraying applications with conventional vehicle-based and manual handheld spraying methods based on existing risk assessment and exposure models. Results suggest that unmanned aerial sprayers reduce dermal exposure for pilots, residents, and bystanders due to their remote operation and reduced drift compared to conventional spraying methods. However, critical exposure points arise during mixing, loading, and auxiliary tasks, where dermal exposure levels exceed model estimates. These elevated exposure levels are attributed to the higher frequency and concentrated handling of plant protection products in unmanned aerial spraying operations compared to traditional spraying methods. These findings highlight the need for targeted risk mitigation strategies to enhance operator safety, such as implementing closed transfer systems, optimized handling protocols, and specialized protective equipment.

DronesVol. 9(5)
Institute of Agrifood Research and Technology (ES), Instituto Nacional de Investigación y Tecnología Agraria y Alimentaria (ES), Instituto Nacional de Seguridad y Salud en el Trabajo (ES), Universidad de Sevilla (ES)
European Commission, European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development, Erasmus+
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Pesticide Exposure and Toxicity
3.50
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.