Fischer–Tropsch Synthesis: Effect of CO Conversion over Ru/NaY Catalyst

Unlike on Fe and Co catalysts, the CO conversion effect on Ru catalyst performance is little reported. This study is undertaken to explore the issue using a series of Ru/NaY catalysts under 200–230 °C, 2.0 MPa, H2/CO = 2, and 10–60% CO conversion in a 1 L continuous stirred tank reactor (CSTR). The results are comparatively studied with those of Fe and Co catalysts reported previously. The NaY support and four 1.0%, 2.5%, 5.0%, and 7.5% Ru/NaY catalysts were characterized by BET, H2 chemisorption, H2O-TPD, XRD, HRTEM, and XANES/EXAFS techniques. The BET and XRD results suggest a high surface area (730 m2/g), high degree of crystallinity of the NaY support, and high dispersion of Ru, while an hcp Ru structure and well-reduced Ru were reflected in the HR-TEM FFT and XANES/EXAFS results. The reaction results indicate that the CO conversion effect on CH4 and C5+ selectivities on the Ru is the same as that on the Fe and Co catalysts, with CH4 selectivity decreasing and C5+ selectivity increasing with increasing CO conversion. However, the CO conversion effect on olefin formation for the Ru catalyst was found to be opposite to that of the Fe and Co; increasing CO conversion enhanced olefin formation but suppressed secondary reactions of 1-olefins. The H2O cofeeding experiments showed that H2O impacted olefin formation by suppressing hydrogen adsorption and hydrogenation. The H2O-TPD experiment evidenced a much stronger H2O adsorption capacity (6.8 mmol/g-cat) on Ru followed by Co (1 mmol/g-cat), and then Fe (0.2 mmol/g-cat)., which showed only a very low H2O adsorption capacity.This finding may explain the opposite CO conversion effect on olefin formation observed on the Ru catalyst, and may also explain why low CH4 selectivity (i.e., 3%) occurred on the Ru catalyst and high CH4 selectivity (i.e., 6–8%) occurred on the Co catalyst, both of which possess low water gas shift (WGS) activity.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Reactions
Published
2025-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/reactions6020031
Primary Topic
Catalysts for Methane Reforming
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Fischer–Tropsch Synthesis: Effect of CO Conversion over Ru/NaY Catalyst

Jia Yang, Gary Jacobs, Wenping Ma, Dali Qian
Reactions
Catalysts for Methane Reforming
article

Fischer–Tropsch Synthesis: Effect of CO Conversion over Ru/NaY Catalyst

Jia Yang, Gary Jacobs, Wenping Ma, Dali Qian
article en

Abstract

Unlike on Fe and Co catalysts, the CO conversion effect on Ru catalyst performance is little reported. This study is undertaken to explore the issue using a series of Ru/NaY catalysts under 200–230 °C, 2.0 MPa, H2/CO = 2, and 10–60% CO conversion in a 1 L continuous stirred tank reactor (CSTR). The results are comparatively studied with those of Fe and Co catalysts reported previously. The NaY support and four 1.0%, 2.5%, 5.0%, and 7.5% Ru/NaY catalysts were characterized by BET, H2 chemisorption, H2O-TPD, XRD, HRTEM, and XANES/EXAFS techniques. The BET and XRD results suggest a high surface area (730 m2/g), high degree of crystallinity of the NaY support, and high dispersion of Ru, while an hcp Ru structure and well-reduced Ru were reflected in the HR-TEM FFT and XANES/EXAFS results. The reaction results indicate that the CO conversion effect on CH4 and C5+ selectivities on the Ru is the same as that on the Fe and Co catalysts, with CH4 selectivity decreasing and C5+ selectivity increasing with increasing CO conversion. However, the CO conversion effect on olefin formation for the Ru catalyst was found to be opposite to that of the Fe and Co; increasing CO conversion enhanced olefin formation but suppressed secondary reactions of 1-olefins. The H2O cofeeding experiments showed that H2O impacted olefin formation by suppressing hydrogen adsorption and hydrogenation. The H2O-TPD experiment evidenced a much stronger H2O adsorption capacity (6.8 mmol/g-cat) on Ru followed by Co (1 mmol/g-cat), and then Fe (0.2 mmol/g-cat)., which showed only a very low H2O adsorption capacity.This finding may explain the opposite CO conversion effect on olefin formation observed on the Ru catalyst, and may also explain why low CH4 selectivity (i.e., 3%) occurred on the Ru catalyst and high CH4 selectivity (i.e., 6–8%) occurred on the Co catalyst, both of which possess low water gas shift (WGS) activity.

ReactionsVol. 6(2)
University of Kentucky (US), Shanghai Jiao Tong University (CN), The University of Texas at San Antonio (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 96%
Catalysts for Methane Reforming
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.