The Influence of Political Interest and Participation on Satisfaction with Authorit arian Regimes: A Comparative Analysis of Russia and Kazakhstan

This study explores the relationship between political interest, political participation, and regime satisfaction in two post-Soviet authoritarian countries: Russia and Kazakhstan. Drawing on data from the 2018 World Values Survey, the analysis categorizes political participation into institutional, non-institutional, and internet-based forms. Using OLS regression models, the study finds that institutional participation, particularly voting, is positively and significantly associated with regime satisfaction in both countries. Non-institutional forms of participation, such as protests, show a negative relationship with regime trust, especially in Kazakhstan. Although internet-based participation does not demonstrate a statistically significant impact, differences in direction between the two countries suggest varying digital political dynamics. The findings highlight that institutional engagement plays a key role in stabilizing authoritarian regimes, while non-institutional activism reflects underlying dissatisfaction. This research contributes to our understanding of authoritarian durability and the role of individual political behavior in hybrid regimes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Global Review of Humanities Arts and Society
Published
2025-04-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.63802/grhas.v1.i1.4
Primary Topic
Political Influence and Corporate Strategies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Influence of Political Interest and Participation on Satisfaction with Authorit arian Regimes: A Comparative Analysis of Russia and Kazakhstan

Jiasong Li
Global Review of Humanities Arts and Society
Political Influence and Corporate Strategies
article

The Influence of Political Interest and Participation on Satisfaction with Authorit arian Regimes: A Comparative Analysis of Russia and Kazakhstan

Jiasong Li
article en

Abstract

This study explores the relationship between political interest, political participation, and regime satisfaction in two post-Soviet authoritarian countries: Russia and Kazakhstan. Drawing on data from the 2018 World Values Survey, the analysis categorizes political participation into institutional, non-institutional, and internet-based forms. Using OLS regression models, the study finds that institutional participation, particularly voting, is positively and significantly associated with regime satisfaction in both countries. Non-institutional forms of participation, such as protests, show a negative relationship with regime trust, especially in Kazakhstan. Although internet-based participation does not demonstrate a statistically significant impact, differences in direction between the two countries suggest varying digital political dynamics. The findings highlight that institutional engagement plays a key role in stabilizing authoritarian regimes, while non-institutional activism reflects underlying dissatisfaction. This research contributes to our understanding of authoritarian durability and the role of individual political behavior in hybrid regimes.

Global Review of Humanities Arts and SocietyVol. 1(1)
Kookmin University (KR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 87%
Political Influence and Corporate Strategies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The Influence of Political Interest and Participation on Satisfaction with Authorit arian Regimes: A Comparative Analysis of Russia and Kazakhstan — Jiasong Li · Global Review of Humanities Arts and Society (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS