Utilisation of Reclaimed Asphalt Pavement for Improving Substandard Subbase

This research attempted to improve substandard subbase by mixing it with reclaimed asphalt pavement. Three substandard soils, namely Soils A, B, C, and RAP, were collected from Phangnga, Southern Thailand. Each soil was mixed with the RAP having the soil to RAP by-weight ratios of 100:0, 90:10, 80:20, 70:30, 60:40, and 50:50. A whole RAP, namely sample D, was also studied, resulting in a total of 19 soil-RAP mixtures. Several testing techniques were carried out to obtain the best mixture for being employed as a subbase. Besides basic properties, the compaction test was conducted to obtain optimum water content. Consequently, such water was employed to prepare samples for the CBR test. Considering overall compaction behaviour, it was found that the maximum dry density gradually increases with the increase of RAP content from 0% up to 30%. After that, it decreased steadily with further increases in RAP from 40% to 50%. Strikingly, all soils had the maximum dry densities when mixed with 30% RAP. As such, the CBR results unsurprisingly showed the same trend, i.e., the maximum values occurred when the mixtures contained 30% RAP. The CBR values for the samples A70R30, B70R30, and C70R30 were 11.0%, 15.9%, and 25.1%, respectively. This indicates that only soil C mixed with 30% RAP qualifies for subbase. These results suggest that 30% of RAP is the most appropriate portion to be mixed with substandard subbase soil to achieve a qualified subbase.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
ASEAN Journal of Scientific and Technological Reports
Published
2025-04-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.55164/ajstr.v28i3.257089
Primary Topic
Asphalt Pavement Performance Evaluation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Utilisation of Reclaimed Asphalt Pavement for Improving Substandard Subbase

Panu Promputthangkoon, Trongrit Lickachai
ASEAN Journal of Scientific and Technological Reports
Asphalt Pavement Performance Evaluation
article

Utilisation of Reclaimed Asphalt Pavement for Improving Substandard Subbase

Panu Promputthangkoon, Trongrit Lickachai
article en

Abstract

This research attempted to improve substandard subbase by mixing it with reclaimed asphalt pavement. Three substandard soils, namely Soils A, B, C, and RAP, were collected from Phangnga, Southern Thailand. Each soil was mixed with the RAP having the soil to RAP by-weight ratios of 100:0, 90:10, 80:20, 70:30, 60:40, and 50:50. A whole RAP, namely sample D, was also studied, resulting in a total of 19 soil-RAP mixtures. Several testing techniques were carried out to obtain the best mixture for being employed as a subbase. Besides basic properties, the compaction test was conducted to obtain optimum water content. Consequently, such water was employed to prepare samples for the CBR test. Considering overall compaction behaviour, it was found that the maximum dry density gradually increases with the increase of RAP content from 0% up to 30%. After that, it decreased steadily with further increases in RAP from 40% to 50%. Strikingly, all soils had the maximum dry densities when mixed with 30% RAP. As such, the CBR results unsurprisingly showed the same trend, i.e., the maximum values occurred when the mixtures contained 30% RAP. The CBR values for the samples A70R30, B70R30, and C70R30 were 11.0%, 15.9%, and 25.1%, respectively. This indicates that only soil C mixed with 30% RAP qualifies for subbase. These results suggest that 30% of RAP is the most appropriate portion to be mixed with substandard subbase soil to achieve a qualified subbase.

ASEAN Journal of Scientific and Technological ReportsVol. 28(3)
Rural Resources (US), Rajamangala University of Technology Srivijaya (TH)
Openalex Percentile: Top 91%
Asphalt Pavement Performance Evaluation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.