Positive interactions between legume intensification technologies and agronomic management: Evidence from participatory on-farm experiments

Smallholder farming in Tanzania centres predominantly on maize as the staple crop, integrated with grain legumes. Technologies like mineral fertilisers and rhizobial inoculants can enhance legume yields and overall farm production, yet their adoption remains limited. This study explores the performance of these technologies across diverse field conditions and assesses their relevance for smallholders. In the 2022/2023 seasons, 40 on-farm experiments were conducted on diverse farmers’ fields in the Songwe region, Tanzania. We assessed the effects of phosphorus (P) fertilisers and Rhizobium inoculation on soybean ( Glycine max ) and common bean ( Phaseolus vulgaris ) yields with improved varieties, and farmer perceptions of these technologies. Grain yields in unamended control plots varied widely: from 0.2 t ha −1 to 2.3 t ha −1 for soybean and from 0.1 t ha −1 to 1.2 t ha −1 for common bean, influenced by soil properties such as soil pH, soil P, and agronomic practices such as timing of weeding. On average, Rhizobium inoculation increased soybean yields by 46 % but did not affect common bean yields; On average phosphorus application increased soybean and common bean by 52 % and 50 %, respectively. Combining P and inoculation raised mean soybean yields by 66 % and common bean by 75 %. Mean return on investment exceeds 2 for all technologies, with soybean inoculation favoured by farmers for its cost-effectiveness. Delayed weeding caused a 75 % reduction in soybean yield in controls. However, delayed weeding with P fertilisers and/or Rhizobium inoculation had no significant negative yield effect, indicating a positive interaction between these technologies and management practices. Our findings show the potential of legume intensification technologies, yet with availability, cost, and market challenges. Treatments: P = P-fertiliser (20 kg ha⁻¹), I = Rhizobium inoculants. A-B = Soybean (Glycine max (L.) Merr.); C-D = Common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) • For soybean, mean yields increased 46 % with inoculation (I), 52 % with P application and 66 % with P + I. • For common beans, mean yields increased with P (50 %), and with P + I (75 %) but not with only I. • Application of P and/or I mitigated weed pressure (with 75 % reduction compared to control yields of soybean). • The mean return on investment (ROI) was above 2 for all legume technologies • Farmers preferred rhizobial inoculation on soybean.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Field Crops Research
Published
2025-05-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2025.109926
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Agronomic Practices and Intercropping Systems
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.90

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Positive interactions between legume intensification technologies and agronomic management: Evidence from participatory on-farm experiments

Jens Andersson, Mukoma Kilakila, Katrien Descheemaeker, Renske Hijbeek et al.
1 citations
Field Crops Research
Agronomic Practices and Intercropping Systems
1.90
article

Positive interactions between legume intensification technologies and agronomic management: Evidence from participatory on-farm experiments

Jens Andersson, Mukoma Kilakila, Katrien Descheemaeker, Renske Hijbeek, K.E. Giller
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Smallholder farming in Tanzania centres predominantly on maize as the staple crop, integrated with grain legumes. Technologies like mineral fertilisers and rhizobial inoculants can enhance legume yields and overall farm production, yet their adoption remains limited. This study explores the performance of these technologies across diverse field conditions and assesses their relevance for smallholders. In the 2022/2023 seasons, 40 on-farm experiments were conducted on diverse farmers’ fields in the Songwe region, Tanzania. We assessed the effects of phosphorus (P) fertilisers and Rhizobium inoculation on soybean ( Glycine max ) and common bean ( Phaseolus vulgaris ) yields with improved varieties, and farmer perceptions of these technologies. Grain yields in unamended control plots varied widely: from 0.2 t ha −1 to 2.3 t ha −1 for soybean and from 0.1 t ha −1 to 1.2 t ha −1 for common bean, influenced by soil properties such as soil pH, soil P, and agronomic practices such as timing of weeding. On average, Rhizobium inoculation increased soybean yields by 46 % but did not affect common bean yields; On average phosphorus application increased soybean and common bean by 52 % and 50 %, respectively. Combining P and inoculation raised mean soybean yields by 66 % and common bean by 75 %. Mean return on investment exceeds 2 for all technologies, with soybean inoculation favoured by farmers for its cost-effectiveness. Delayed weeding caused a 75 % reduction in soybean yield in controls. However, delayed weeding with P fertilisers and/or Rhizobium inoculation had no significant negative yield effect, indicating a positive interaction between these technologies and management practices. Our findings show the potential of legume intensification technologies, yet with availability, cost, and market challenges. Treatments: P = P-fertiliser (20 kg ha⁻¹), I = Rhizobium inoculants. A-B = Soybean (Glycine max (L.) Merr.); C-D = Common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) • For soybean, mean yields increased 46 % with inoculation (I), 52 % with P application and 66 % with P + I. • For common beans, mean yields increased with P (50 %), and with P + I (75 %) but not with only I. • Application of P and/or I mitigated weed pressure (with 75 % reduction compared to control yields of soybean). • The mean return on investment (ROI) was above 2 for all legume technologies • Farmers preferred rhizobial inoculation on soybean.

Field Crops ResearchVol. 328
Graduate School Experimental Plant Sciences (NL), Wageningen University & Research (NL)
European Commission
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 17%
Agronomic Practices and Intercropping Systems
1.90
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.