Predicting potential soil and groundwater contamination risks from gas stations using three machine learning models (XGBoost, LightGBM, and Random Forest)

Gas station sites pose potential risks of soil and groundwater contamination, which not only threatens public health and property but may also damage the assets and reputation of businesses and government entities. Given the complex nature of soil and groundwater contamination at gas station sites, this study utilizes field data from basic and environmental information, maintenance information for tank and pipeline monitoring, and environmental monitoring to develop machine learning models for predicting potential contamination risks and evaluating high-impact risk factors. The research employs three machine learning models: XGBoost, LightGBM, and Random Forest (RF). To compare the performance of these models in predicting soil and groundwater contamination, multiple performance metrics were utilized, including Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curves, Precision-Recall graphs, and Confusion Matrix (CM). The Confusion Matrix analysis revealed the following results: accuracy of 85.1–87.4 %, precision of 86.6–88.3 %, recall of 83.0–87.2 %, and F1 score of 84.8–87.8 %. Performance ranking across all metrics consistently showed: XGBoost > LightGBM > RF. The area under the ROC curve and precision-recall curve for the three models were 0.95 (XGBoost), 0.94 (LightGBM), and 0.93 (RF), respectively. While all three machine learning approaches demonstrated satisfactory predictive capabilities, the XGBoost model exhibited optimal performance across all evaluation metrics. This research demonstrates that properly trained machine learning models can serve as effective tools for environmental risk assessment and management. These findings have significant implications for decision-makers in environmental protection, enabling more accurate prediction and control of contamination risks, thereby enhancing the preservation of ecological systems, public health, and property security.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Process Safety and Environmental Protection
Published
2025-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psep.2025.107249
Citations
33
Primary Topic
Atmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
36.48
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Predicting potential soil and groundwater contamination risks from gas stations using three machine learning models (XGBoost, LightGBM, and Random Forest)

Tai‐Kuei Yu, Huey-Long Chen, Tai‐Yi Yu, Shen-De Chen et al.
33 citations
Process Safety and Environmental Protection
Atmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics
36.48
article

Predicting potential soil and groundwater contamination risks from gas stations using three machine learning models (XGBoost, LightGBM, and Random Forest)

Tai‐Kuei Yu, Huey-Long Chen, Tai‐Yi Yu, Shen-De Chen, I‐Cheng Chang
article en
33 citations

Abstract

Gas station sites pose potential risks of soil and groundwater contamination, which not only threatens public health and property but may also damage the assets and reputation of businesses and government entities. Given the complex nature of soil and groundwater contamination at gas station sites, this study utilizes field data from basic and environmental information, maintenance information for tank and pipeline monitoring, and environmental monitoring to develop machine learning models for predicting potential contamination risks and evaluating high-impact risk factors. The research employs three machine learning models: XGBoost, LightGBM, and Random Forest (RF). To compare the performance of these models in predicting soil and groundwater contamination, multiple performance metrics were utilized, including Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curves, Precision-Recall graphs, and Confusion Matrix (CM). The Confusion Matrix analysis revealed the following results: accuracy of 85.1–87.4 %, precision of 86.6–88.3 %, recall of 83.0–87.2 %, and F1 score of 84.8–87.8 %. Performance ranking across all metrics consistently showed: XGBoost > LightGBM > RF. The area under the ROC curve and precision-recall curve for the three models were 0.95 (XGBoost), 0.94 (LightGBM), and 0.93 (RF), respectively. While all three machine learning approaches demonstrated satisfactory predictive capabilities, the XGBoost model exhibited optimal performance across all evaluation metrics. This research demonstrates that properly trained machine learning models can serve as effective tools for environmental risk assessment and management. These findings have significant implications for decision-makers in environmental protection, enabling more accurate prediction and control of contamination risks, thereby enhancing the preservation of ecological systems, public health, and property security.

Process Safety and Environmental ProtectionVol. 199
National Quemoy University (TW), Ming Chuan University (TW), Apex (Taiwan) (TW), National Ilan University (TW)
Openalex Percentile: Top 0%
Atmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics
36.48
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.