A decision support tool for the selection of biophysical methodologies to assess urban nature-based solutions using regulating ecosystem services

Nature-based Solutions (NbS) are cost-effective interventions that restore natural cycles while delivering environmental, social, and economic benefits. However, selecting appropriate biophysical evaluation methods remains a challenge, particularly in data-scarce urban contexts. Existing methodologies often lack guidance on method selection based on local data, resources, and technical constraints. To address this gap, this study develops a Decision Support Tool (DST) for selecting biophysical evaluation methods for urban NbS at neighborhood, block, or district scales. The DST is based on a systematic literature review (SLR) of 256 studies, which identified the most widely used methodology-empirical equations, computational tools, and monitoring systems—along with key constraints such as budget, timeline, data availability, and technical expertise. Using this analysis, decision rules were established to guide method selection under different resource conditions. DST comprises three components: (i) a feasibility analysis for NbS selection, (ii) a decision-making framework for biophysical evaluation method selection, and (iii) an ecosystem services index for scenario comparison. The methodology was tested in Bogotá, Colombia, within the "El Reencuentro" urban renewal project. Results highlight the importance of urban forests in delivering ecosystem services and demonstrate the suitability of simpler methods in resource-constrained settings. By adapting biophysical evaluation approaches to local conditions, this study provides a practical framework to support NbS implementation in urban planning. • The methodology adapts NbS evaluation methods to budget, time, data availability, and technical requirements. • When biophysical effects are well understood, assessment methods become less critical. • NbS effectiveness can be evaluated with limited data, supporting simpler methods. • These results can foster dialogue with stakeholders and promote NbS adoption in urban areas.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Urban forestry & urban greening
Published
2025-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2025.128842
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Land Use and Ecosystem Services
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.11
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A decision support tool for the selection of biophysical methodologies to assess urban nature-based solutions using regulating ecosystem services

Dániel Kozák, Tom Wild, J. Patiño, Juliana Uribe-Aguado et al.
1 citations
Urban forestry & urban greening
Land Use and Ecosystem Services
1.11
article

A decision support tool for the selection of biophysical methodologies to assess urban nature-based solutions using regulating ecosystem services

Dániel Kozák, Tom Wild, J. Patiño, Juliana Uribe-Aguado, Juan Pablo Rodríguez
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Nature-based Solutions (NbS) are cost-effective interventions that restore natural cycles while delivering environmental, social, and economic benefits. However, selecting appropriate biophysical evaluation methods remains a challenge, particularly in data-scarce urban contexts. Existing methodologies often lack guidance on method selection based on local data, resources, and technical constraints. To address this gap, this study develops a Decision Support Tool (DST) for selecting biophysical evaluation methods for urban NbS at neighborhood, block, or district scales. The DST is based on a systematic literature review (SLR) of 256 studies, which identified the most widely used methodology-empirical equations, computational tools, and monitoring systems—along with key constraints such as budget, timeline, data availability, and technical expertise. Using this analysis, decision rules were established to guide method selection under different resource conditions. DST comprises three components: (i) a feasibility analysis for NbS selection, (ii) a decision-making framework for biophysical evaluation method selection, and (iii) an ecosystem services index for scenario comparison. The methodology was tested in Bogotá, Colombia, within the "El Reencuentro" urban renewal project. Results highlight the importance of urban forests in delivering ecosystem services and demonstrate the suitability of simpler methods in resource-constrained settings. By adapting biophysical evaluation approaches to local conditions, this study provides a practical framework to support NbS implementation in urban planning. • The methodology adapts NbS evaluation methods to budget, time, data availability, and technical requirements. • When biophysical effects are well understood, assessment methods become less critical. • NbS effectiveness can be evaluated with limited data, supporting simpler methods. • These results can foster dialogue with stakeholders and promote NbS adoption in urban areas.

Urban forestry & urban greeningVol. 112
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (AR), Universidad de Los Andes (CO), Universidad de Los Andes (BO), University of Sheffield (GB)
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 25%
Land Use and Ecosystem Services
1.11
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.