Racialized Romance: An Intersectional Analysis of East Asian Women’s Masculinities Construction Processes

Individuals’ understandings of gender are profoundly shaped by racial formation processes. Yet scholars have not sufficiently investigated how people construct racialized masculinities beyond a White/non-White racial paradigm. The present study begins to address this limitation by analyzing 40 in-depth qualitative interviews with East Asian women in relationships with White, Black, and South Asian men. I ask, How do participants construct racialized masculinities in romantic contexts? Respondents with White partners often constructed Asian masculinity using White masculinity as an idealized benchmark. By associating Asian masculinity with patriarchy and White masculinity with gender egalitarianism, some women with White partners reinforced controlling images of Asian men while rendering White male patriarchy less visible. In contrast, participants with partners of color often linked White masculinity to undesirable traits like ignorance, arrogance, and entitlement. While challenging dominant narratives about the superiority of White masculinity, however, some respondents with partners of color also reproduced race and gender hierarchies by drawing on racial stereotypes to explain their preferences for Black and South Asian men over East Asian men. These findings reveal important mechanisms undergirding the reproduction of social hierarchies in the United States—mechanisms that do not necessarily center White masculinity as an idealized standard but nonetheless (1) homogenize non-White masculinities in ways that reinforce longstanding stereotypes about men of color and (2) entrench White masculinity as the normative standard of desirability.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Sociology of Race and Ethnicity
Published
2025-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/23326492251336140
Primary Topic
Gender Roles and Identity Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Racialized Romance: An Intersectional Analysis of East Asian Women’s Masculinities Construction Processes

Olivia Y. Hu
Sociology of Race and Ethnicity
Gender Roles and Identity Studies
article

Racialized Romance: An Intersectional Analysis of East Asian Women’s Masculinities Construction Processes

Olivia Y. Hu
article en

Abstract

Individuals’ understandings of gender are profoundly shaped by racial formation processes. Yet scholars have not sufficiently investigated how people construct racialized masculinities beyond a White/non-White racial paradigm. The present study begins to address this limitation by analyzing 40 in-depth qualitative interviews with East Asian women in relationships with White, Black, and South Asian men. I ask, How do participants construct racialized masculinities in romantic contexts? Respondents with White partners often constructed Asian masculinity using White masculinity as an idealized benchmark. By associating Asian masculinity with patriarchy and White masculinity with gender egalitarianism, some women with White partners reinforced controlling images of Asian men while rendering White male patriarchy less visible. In contrast, participants with partners of color often linked White masculinity to undesirable traits like ignorance, arrogance, and entitlement. While challenging dominant narratives about the superiority of White masculinity, however, some respondents with partners of color also reproduced race and gender hierarchies by drawing on racial stereotypes to explain their preferences for Black and South Asian men over East Asian men. These findings reveal important mechanisms undergirding the reproduction of social hierarchies in the United States—mechanisms that do not necessarily center White masculinity as an idealized standard but nonetheless (1) homogenize non-White masculinities in ways that reinforce longstanding stereotypes about men of color and (2) entrench White masculinity as the normative standard of desirability.

Sociology of Race and EthnicityVol. 12(1)
University of Pennsylvania (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 88%
Gender Roles and Identity Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.