A Method for Cockpit Human-Machine Interface Assessment Based on Human Error Analysis

With technological advancements and increased automation, many traditional mechanical failures have been effectively prevented and resolved, but human errors remain difficult to completely avoid. New technologies and highly integrated complex designs are continuously being introduced into the cockpit, presenting new challenges for cockpit operations. Advanced human-machine interface designs that lack consideration for human factors may, paradoxically, increase the risk of operational errors by the crew, affecting operational efficiency and potentially threatening flight safety. Therefore, it is crucial to fully consider human factors in cockpit human-machine interface design, identify potential design traps that may lead to human errors, optimize the design accordingly, and thereby improve crew operational efficiency and flight safety. This paper proposes a systematic, structured assessment method for civil aircraft cockpit human-machine interfaces based on human error analysis. This method analyzes the cockpit human-machine interface by predicting human errors caused by or related to the design and assesses the adequacy and effectiveness of the cockpit human-machine interface in managing crew errors. It aims to help designers identify potential deficiencies in the cockpit human-machine interface design and enables programs to understand and manage potential human error effects, understand the relative risks and uncertainties within the system design, and influence decisions throughout the system lifecycle. And this method is good at standardization of Cockpit HMI human error analysis during CS 25.1302 compliance demonstration practices.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-12-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/icarce63054.2024.00084
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Ergonomics and Musculoskeletal Disorders
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.64
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Method for Cockpit Human-Machine Interface Assessment Based on Human Error Analysis

Pengyu Yang, Qian Shen, Shasha Lu, Yuan Wang et al.
1 citations
Ergonomics and Musculoskeletal Disorders
0.64
article

A Method for Cockpit Human-Machine Interface Assessment Based on Human Error Analysis

Pengyu Yang, Qian Shen, Shasha Lu, Yuan Wang, Yao Zhu
article en
1 citations

Abstract

With technological advancements and increased automation, many traditional mechanical failures have been effectively prevented and resolved, but human errors remain difficult to completely avoid. New technologies and highly integrated complex designs are continuously being introduced into the cockpit, presenting new challenges for cockpit operations. Advanced human-machine interface designs that lack consideration for human factors may, paradoxically, increase the risk of operational errors by the crew, affecting operational efficiency and potentially threatening flight safety. Therefore, it is crucial to fully consider human factors in cockpit human-machine interface design, identify potential design traps that may lead to human errors, optimize the design accordingly, and thereby improve crew operational efficiency and flight safety. This paper proposes a systematic, structured assessment method for civil aircraft cockpit human-machine interfaces based on human error analysis. This method analyzes the cockpit human-machine interface by predicting human errors caused by or related to the design and assesses the adequacy and effectiveness of the cockpit human-machine interface in managing crew errors. It aims to help designers identify potential deficiencies in the cockpit human-machine interface design and enables programs to understand and manage potential human error effects, understand the relative risks and uncertainties within the system design, and influence decisions throughout the system lifecycle. And this method is good at standardization of Cockpit HMI human error analysis during CS 25.1302 compliance demonstration practices.

Commercial Aircraft Corporation of China (China) (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 23%
Ergonomics and Musculoskeletal Disorders
0.64
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

A Method for Cockpit Human-Machine Interface Assessment Based on Human Error Analysis — Pengyu Yang, Qian Shen, et al. · (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS