The Explanation Necessity for Healthcare AI

Explainability is a critical factor in enhancing the trustworthiness and acceptance of artificial intelligence (AI) in healthcare, where decisions directly impact patient outcomes. Despite advancements in AI interpretability, clear guidelines on when and to what extent explanations are required in medical applications remain lacking. We propose a novel categorization system comprising four classes of explanation necessity (self-explainable, semi-explainable, non-explainable, and new-patterns discovery), guiding the required level of explanation; whether local (patient or sample level), global (cohort or dataset level), or both. To support this system, we introduce a mathematical formulation that incorporates three key factors: (i) robustness of the evaluation protocol, (ii) variability of expert observations, and (iii) representation dimensionality of the application. This framework provides a practical tool for researchers to determine the appropriate depth of explainability needed, addressing the critical question: When does an AI medical application need to be explained, and at what level of detail?.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-03-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/citrexcompanion65208.2025.10981502
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Impact of AI and Big Data on Business and Society
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.11

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Explanation Necessity for Healthcare AI

Graham K. Murray, John Suckling, Píetro Lió, Héloïse de Vareilles et al.
1 citations
Impact of AI and Big Data on Business and Society
2.11
article

The Explanation Necessity for Healthcare AI

Graham K. Murray, John Suckling, Píetro Lió, Héloïse de Vareilles, Michail Mamalakis
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Explainability is a critical factor in enhancing the trustworthiness and acceptance of artificial intelligence (AI) in healthcare, where decisions directly impact patient outcomes. Despite advancements in AI interpretability, clear guidelines on when and to what extent explanations are required in medical applications remain lacking. We propose a novel categorization system comprising four classes of explanation necessity (self-explainable, semi-explainable, non-explainable, and new-patterns discovery), guiding the required level of explanation; whether local (patient or sample level), global (cohort or dataset level), or both. To support this system, we introduce a mathematical formulation that incorporates three key factors: (i) robustness of the evaluation protocol, (ii) variability of expert observations, and (iii) representation dimensionality of the application. This framework provides a practical tool for researchers to determine the appropriate depth of explainability needed, addressing the critical question: When does an AI medical application need to be explained, and at what level of detail?.

University of Cambridge (GB)
NIHR Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Impact of AI and Big Data on Business and Society
2.11
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.