Exploring Educators' Multidimensional Perspectives on Generative AI's Impact in Education: A Study Using Q Methodology

The rapid development of generative AI has attracted significant attention in education. This study uses Q methodology to explore educators' views on AI's impact across five key dimensions: educational theory, learning outcomes, educational technology, educational ethics, and pedagogy. The analysis identifies three educator groups: (1) Education Stalwarts Emphasizing Humanistic Care (F1), who prioritize values like critical thinking, self-motivation, and social responsibility; (2) Education Reformers Advocating Technological Integration (F2), who support AI-driven innovations; and (3) Education Explorers Focused on Learning Experiences (F3), who emphasize personalized, technology-enhanced learning. Although perspectives on AI integration vary, there is agreement that education should promote human progress and personal growth. This study contributes to the ongoing discourse by advocating for a balanced approach that integrates tradition with innovation to enhance educational outcomes.

Authors

Publication Details

Published
2025-03-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/iceit64364.2025.10975838
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Education and Learning Interventions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.25
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Exploring Educators' Multidimensional Perspectives on Generative AI's Impact in Education: A Study Using Q Methodology

Zhengwei Wang, Pan Mengting, Zhao Guoan
1 citations
Education and Learning Interventions
3.25
article

Exploring Educators' Multidimensional Perspectives on Generative AI's Impact in Education: A Study Using Q Methodology

Zhengwei Wang, Pan Mengting, Zhao Guoan
article en
1 citations

Abstract

The rapid development of generative AI has attracted significant attention in education. This study uses Q methodology to explore educators' views on AI's impact across five key dimensions: educational theory, learning outcomes, educational technology, educational ethics, and pedagogy. The analysis identifies three educator groups: (1) Education Stalwarts Emphasizing Humanistic Care (F1), who prioritize values like critical thinking, self-motivation, and social responsibility; (2) Education Reformers Advocating Technological Integration (F2), who support AI-driven innovations; and (3) Education Explorers Focused on Learning Experiences (F3), who emphasize personalized, technology-enhanced learning. Although perspectives on AI integration vary, there is agreement that education should promote human progress and personal growth. This study contributes to the ongoing discourse by advocating for a balanced approach that integrates tradition with innovation to enhance educational outcomes.

Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Education and Learning Interventions
3.25
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Exploring Educators' Multidimensional Perspectives on Generative AI's Impact in Education: A Study Using Q Methodology — Zhengwei Wang, Pan Mengting, et al. · (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS