Validation and uncertainty estimation for multielement determination using ICP-OES according to the ASTM E2941-14 standard

Standardized analytical methods for determining elemental concentrations require thorough validation and estimation of measurement uncertainty.Inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectrometry (ICP-OES) is a widely used technique for multielement analysis with the ASTM E2941-14 standard specifying the analytical conditions for its application.This study aims to validate the ICP-OES method and estimate the expanded uncertainty for multielement determination in accordance with ASTM E2941-14.Method validation and uncertainty estimation were conducted following Eurachem (2014) and Eurachem-CITAC (2012) guidelines, respectively.The method demonstrated acceptable linearity, with coefficients of determination (R 2 ) ranging from 0.9972 to 1.0000 and correlation coefficients (R) from 0.9982 to 1.0000, exceeding the acceptance criterion (R 2 /R 0.995).Accuracy under repeatability conditions showed coefficients of variation between 1.0% and 8.0%, indicating good consistency.Trueness evaluation revealed no significant bias, with recovery rates within the acceptable range of 100% 10%.Combined uncertainty values ranged from 0.0425 (silver; Ag) to 0.5156 (scandium; Sc), corresponding to relative uncertainties of 1.25% to 8.16%, respectively.Expanded uncertainties ranged from 0.0850 (Ag) to 1.0312 (Sc).The dominant sources of relative uncertainty were associated with calibration curve-based concentration measurements and volumetric equipment.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Chemical Metrology
Published
2025-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.25135/jcm.112.2502.3435
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Scientific Measurement and Uncertainty Evaluation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.40
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Validation and uncertainty estimation for multielement determination using ICP-OES according to the ASTM E2941-14 standard

Paulina Vázquez-Bustamante, Amparo Alegrı́a, A. I. Figueroa, Karla D. Murillo-Castillo et al.
1 citations
Journal of Chemical Metrology
Scientific Measurement and Uncertainty Evaluation
1.40
article

Validation and uncertainty estimation for multielement determination using ICP-OES according to the ASTM E2941-14 standard

Paulina Vázquez-Bustamante, Amparo Alegrı́a, A. I. Figueroa, Karla D. Murillo-Castillo, Rodrigo Martínez-Peñuñuri, Marcela Montoya-Blumenkron, Trinidad Quizán-Plata, Dayana Itzajara Estrada-Gonzalez
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Standardized analytical methods for determining elemental concentrations require thorough validation and estimation of measurement uncertainty.Inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectrometry (ICP-OES) is a widely used technique for multielement analysis with the ASTM E2941-14 standard specifying the analytical conditions for its application.This study aims to validate the ICP-OES method and estimate the expanded uncertainty for multielement determination in accordance with ASTM E2941-14.Method validation and uncertainty estimation were conducted following Eurachem (2014) and Eurachem-CITAC (2012) guidelines, respectively.The method demonstrated acceptable linearity, with coefficients of determination (R 2 ) ranging from 0.9972 to 1.0000 and correlation coefficients (R) from 0.9982 to 1.0000, exceeding the acceptance criterion (R 2 /R 0.995).Accuracy under repeatability conditions showed coefficients of variation between 1.0% and 8.0%, indicating good consistency.Trueness evaluation revealed no significant bias, with recovery rates within the acceptable range of 100% 10%.Combined uncertainty values ranged from 0.0425 (silver; Ag) to 0.5156 (scandium; Sc), corresponding to relative uncertainties of 1.25% to 8.16%, respectively.Expanded uncertainties ranged from 0.0850 (Ag) to 1.0312 (Sc).The dominant sources of relative uncertainty were associated with calibration curve-based concentration measurements and volumetric equipment.

Journal of Chemical Metrology(1)
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 17%
Scientific Measurement and Uncertainty Evaluation
1.40
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Validation and uncertainty estimation for multielement determination using ICP-OES according to the ASTM E2941-14 standard — Paulina Vázquez-Bustamante, Amparo Alegrı́a, et al. · Journal of Chemical Metrology (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS