Global trade and finance turmoil: the Ukraine–Russia war’s impact

Purpose This study examines the economic and financial impacts of the Ukraine–Russia conflict on global trade, focusing on supply chain disruptions, financial market volatility and shifts in trade policies. The research evaluates how geopolitical instability reshapes trade networks, financial stability and risk management strategies. Design/methodology/approach A qualitative approach is employed, analyzing secondary data from international trade and financial institutions. Thematic coding identifies key trends in trade disruptions, financial volatility, policy adaptations and resilience strategies. The study integrates the Gravity Model of Trade to contextualize systemic shifts in trade patterns and financial stability. Findings The conflict has significantly disrupted global trade, particularly in energy and agricultural sectors, leading to increased commodity prices and logistical challenges. Financial markets experienced heightened volatility, with sharp currency fluctuations and increased risk premiums. Governments responded with policy adaptations such as regionalization and trade diversification, while businesses implemented resilience strategies, including supply chain diversification and technological innovation. Research limitations/implications The study relies on secondary data, which may limit broader applicability. Future research should incorporate quantitative modeling to measure long-term trade and financial impacts. Practical implications Findings inform policymakers on mitigating geopolitical trade risks and guide businesses in adopting proactive resilience strategies. Social implications Strengthening global supply chains and financial stability mechanisms can enhance economic security and reduce socio-economic consequences of geopolitical conflicts. Originality/value This study extends the Gravity Model of Trade by incorporating geopolitical disruptions and financial market responses. It provides empirical insights into the interplay between trade policies, financial stability and business adaptation strategies, offering a comprehensive framework for understanding global economic resilience in times of conflict.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
The Journal of Risk Finance
Published
2025-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/jrf-02-2025-0091
Citations
9
Primary Topic
Environmental and Biological Research in Conflict Zones
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
21.80
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Global trade and finance turmoil: the Ukraine–Russia war’s impact

Birjees Rahat, Matteo Rossi, Charbel Salloum, Masihullah Nemat
9 citations
The Journal of Risk Finance
Environmental and Biological Research in Conflict Zones
21.80
article

Global trade and finance turmoil: the Ukraine–Russia war’s impact

Birjees Rahat, Matteo Rossi, Charbel Salloum, Masihullah Nemat
article en
9 citations

Abstract

Purpose This study examines the economic and financial impacts of the Ukraine–Russia conflict on global trade, focusing on supply chain disruptions, financial market volatility and shifts in trade policies. The research evaluates how geopolitical instability reshapes trade networks, financial stability and risk management strategies. Design/methodology/approach A qualitative approach is employed, analyzing secondary data from international trade and financial institutions. Thematic coding identifies key trends in trade disruptions, financial volatility, policy adaptations and resilience strategies. The study integrates the Gravity Model of Trade to contextualize systemic shifts in trade patterns and financial stability. Findings The conflict has significantly disrupted global trade, particularly in energy and agricultural sectors, leading to increased commodity prices and logistical challenges. Financial markets experienced heightened volatility, with sharp currency fluctuations and increased risk premiums. Governments responded with policy adaptations such as regionalization and trade diversification, while businesses implemented resilience strategies, including supply chain diversification and technological innovation. Research limitations/implications The study relies on secondary data, which may limit broader applicability. Future research should incorporate quantitative modeling to measure long-term trade and financial impacts. Practical implications Findings inform policymakers on mitigating geopolitical trade risks and guide businesses in adopting proactive resilience strategies. Social implications Strengthening global supply chains and financial stability mechanisms can enhance economic security and reduce socio-economic consequences of geopolitical conflicts. Originality/value This study extends the Gravity Model of Trade by incorporating geopolitical disruptions and financial market responses. It provides empirical insights into the interplay between trade policies, financial stability and business adaptation strategies, offering a comprehensive framework for understanding global economic resilience in times of conflict.

The Journal of Risk FinanceVol. 26(3)
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Environmental and Biological Research in Conflict Zones
21.80
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.