Smallpox baby revisited: Exploring an authorised science heritage discourse in science museum exhibitions

Based on research in two exhibitions in a science museum in the UK, this paper explores how science and society relationships are constructed through the display of one specific object, a WHO leaflet about smallpox. I trace the display of this leaflet through two exhibitions about medicine, 40 years apart. Drawing on the concept of the authorised heritage discourse and work in Black studies and Science and Technology Studies, I analyse the display of the leaflet, the stories it is used to tell and the modes of relation these stories contribute to. Rather than trying to evaluate which exhibition does a better (or worse) job displaying the leaflet, in this paper I argue that both displays were enmeshed with and reproduce an authorised science heritage discourse. I show how nationalistic, celebratory stories about science set up racialised and colonial modes of relation, and suggest counter-stories, not least critically engaging with the ever-present shadow of colonialism, present museums with valuable opportunities for change.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Museum and Society
Published
2025-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.29311/mas.v23i1.4423
Primary Topic
Science Education and Perceptions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Smallpox baby revisited: Exploring an authorised science heritage discourse in science museum exhibitions

Emily Dawson
Museum and Society
Science Education and Perceptions
article

Smallpox baby revisited: Exploring an authorised science heritage discourse in science museum exhibitions

Emily Dawson
article en

Abstract

Based on research in two exhibitions in a science museum in the UK, this paper explores how science and society relationships are constructed through the display of one specific object, a WHO leaflet about smallpox. I trace the display of this leaflet through two exhibitions about medicine, 40 years apart. Drawing on the concept of the authorised heritage discourse and work in Black studies and Science and Technology Studies, I analyse the display of the leaflet, the stories it is used to tell and the modes of relation these stories contribute to. Rather than trying to evaluate which exhibition does a better (or worse) job displaying the leaflet, in this paper I argue that both displays were enmeshed with and reproduce an authorised science heritage discourse. I show how nationalistic, celebratory stories about science set up racialised and colonial modes of relation, and suggest counter-stories, not least critically engaging with the ever-present shadow of colonialism, present museums with valuable opportunities for change.

Museum and SocietyVol. 23(1)
University College London (GB)
Leverhulme Trust
Openalex Percentile: Top 91%
Science Education and Perceptions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.