Prompt engineering in ChatGPT for literature review: practical guide exemplified with studies on white phosphors

Recent advancements in large language models (LLMs) such as ChatGPT have been transforming the ways we approach science tasks, including data analysis, experimental design, writing, and literature review. However, due to the lack of specialized knowledge and inherent issues such as plagiarism and hallucinations (i.e., false or misleading outputs), it is necessary for users to verify the output information. To address these issues, prompt engineering has become a significant task. In this study, we evaluate the performance of different prompt styles for extracting information from literature abstracts and emphasize the importance of prompt engineering for such scientific tasks. The literature on white phosphor materials is used for this study due to the availability of important and quantitative information in the abstracts. Through detailed comparative and quantitative evaluation, we provide guidance on preparing suitable and effective prompts based on the types of information sought.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Reports
Published
2025-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-99423-9
Citations
8
Primary Topic
Radiation Detection and Scintillator Technologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
15.06

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Prompt engineering in ChatGPT for literature review: practical guide exemplified with studies on white phosphors

Mijeong Kang, D. Lee, Y. P. Lee, Seunghun Lee
8 citations
Scientific Reports
Radiation Detection and Scintillator Technologies
15.06
article

Prompt engineering in ChatGPT for literature review: practical guide exemplified with studies on white phosphors

Mijeong Kang, D. Lee, Y. P. Lee, Seunghun Lee
article en
8 citations

Abstract

Recent advancements in large language models (LLMs) such as ChatGPT have been transforming the ways we approach science tasks, including data analysis, experimental design, writing, and literature review. However, due to the lack of specialized knowledge and inherent issues such as plagiarism and hallucinations (i.e., false or misleading outputs), it is necessary for users to verify the output information. To address these issues, prompt engineering has become a significant task. In this study, we evaluate the performance of different prompt styles for extracting information from literature abstracts and emphasize the importance of prompt engineering for such scientific tasks. The literature on white phosphor materials is used for this study due to the availability of important and quantitative information in the abstracts. Through detailed comparative and quantitative evaluation, we provide guidance on preparing suitable and effective prompts based on the types of information sought.

Scientific ReportsVol. 15(1)
Pusan National University (KR), Pukyong National University (KR)
National Research Foundation, National Research Foundation of Korea, Ministry of Education, India
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Radiation Detection and Scintillator Technologies
15.06
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Prompt engineering in ChatGPT for literature review: practical guide exemplified with studies on white phosphors — Mijeong Kang, D. Lee, et al. · Scientific Reports (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS