Legal Communication and Marginalized Communities

Legal communication plays a pivotal role in the interpretation, application, and accessibility of law. However, marginalized communities characterized by social, economic, cultural, and linguistic disenfranchisement continue to face systemic barriers that hinder effective communication within legal systems. This paper examines the intricate relationship between legal discourse and marginalized populations by examining the structural, linguistic, and institutional barriers that inhibit access to justice. Drawing on interdisciplinary perspectives from law, psychology, and communication studies, the paper analyzes how legal language, courtroom norms, attorney-client dynamics, and cultural misunderstandings collectively contribute to legal disenfranchisement. Through case studies, technological considerations, and discussions on legal literacy, the research highlights the critical need for culturally competent legal practices, improved public legal education, and reforms in legal ethics and policy. Ultimately, the paper advocates for inclusive legal communication strategies that empower marginalized voices, foster trust, and promote equitable participation in the justice system. Keywords: Legal communication, Marginalized communities, Legal literacy, Cultural competency, Access to justice, Legal ethics, Language barrier.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
NEWPORT INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CURRENT ISSUES IN ARTS AND MANAGEMENT
Published
2025-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.59298/nijciam/2025/6.1.96105
Primary Topic
Comparative and International Law Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Legal Communication and Marginalized Communities

Maria Edet Umo
1 links
NEWPORT INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CURRENT ISSUES IN ARTS AND MANAGEMENT
Comparative and International Law Studies
article

Legal Communication and Marginalized Communities

Maria Edet Umo
article en

Abstract

Legal communication plays a pivotal role in the interpretation, application, and accessibility of law. However, marginalized communities characterized by social, economic, cultural, and linguistic disenfranchisement continue to face systemic barriers that hinder effective communication within legal systems. This paper examines the intricate relationship between legal discourse and marginalized populations by examining the structural, linguistic, and institutional barriers that inhibit access to justice. Drawing on interdisciplinary perspectives from law, psychology, and communication studies, the paper analyzes how legal language, courtroom norms, attorney-client dynamics, and cultural misunderstandings collectively contribute to legal disenfranchisement. Through case studies, technological considerations, and discussions on legal literacy, the research highlights the critical need for culturally competent legal practices, improved public legal education, and reforms in legal ethics and policy. Ultimately, the paper advocates for inclusive legal communication strategies that empower marginalized voices, foster trust, and promote equitable participation in the justice system. Keywords: Legal communication, Marginalized communities, Legal literacy, Cultural competency, Access to justice, Legal ethics, Language barrier.

NEWPORT INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CURRENT ISSUES IN ARTS AND MANAGEMENTVol. 6(1)
Kampala International University (UG)
Openalex Percentile: Top 85%
Comparative and International Law Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.