Comparative Analysis of Student Learning Outcomes of Conventional Learning with Genetic Intelligence-Based Learning

This study compares the learning outcomes between two groups from equivalent schools. One group underwent an assessment to identify the genetic intelligence types of both teachers and students. Teachers in this experimental group, having become familiar with their own and their students' genetic intelligence types, received additional training tailored to these intelligence types. The results indicated a significant difference in learning outcomes between the experimental and control groups, as evidenced by an Independent Samples t-Test yielding a two-tailed p-value of 0.001 (p < 0.05). Furthermore, the experimental group's average post-test score was 73, compared to 69.62 in the control group.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PALAPA
Published
2025-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.36088/palapa.v13i1.5668
Primary Topic
Genetics, Bioinformatics, and Biomedical Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative Analysis of Student Learning Outcomes of Conventional Learning with Genetic Intelligence-Based Learning

Haris Supratno, Khoirotul Idawati, Ariga Bahrodin, Khoirul Umam et al.
PALAPA
Genetics, Bioinformatics, and Biomedical Research
article

Comparative Analysis of Student Learning Outcomes of Conventional Learning with Genetic Intelligence-Based Learning

Haris Supratno, Khoirotul Idawati, Ariga Bahrodin, Khoirul Umam, Siti Rofiah, Asriana Kibtiyah
article en

Abstract

This study compares the learning outcomes between two groups from equivalent schools. One group underwent an assessment to identify the genetic intelligence types of both teachers and students. Teachers in this experimental group, having become familiar with their own and their students' genetic intelligence types, received additional training tailored to these intelligence types. The results indicated a significant difference in learning outcomes between the experimental and control groups, as evidenced by an Independent Samples t-Test yielding a two-tailed p-value of 0.001 (p < 0.05). Furthermore, the experimental group's average post-test score was 73, compared to 69.62 in the control group.

PALAPAVol. 13(1)
Universitas Negeri Surabaya (ID), Universitas Wahid Hasyim (ID), Universitas Hasyim Asy'ari (ID)
Openalex Percentile: Top 92%
Genetics, Bioinformatics, and Biomedical Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Comparative Analysis of Student Learning Outcomes of Conventional Learning with Genetic Intelligence-Based Learning — Haris Supratno, Khoirotul Idawati, et al. · PALAPA (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS