NIPT: Routine versus Considered Options

In addition to yielding positive or negative results, NIPT can occasionally produce inconclusive or nonreportable outcomes, most often due to an insufficient amount of fetal

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Fetal Medicine
Published
2024-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0045-1808249
Primary Topic
Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

NIPT: Routine versus Considered Options

Rupam Arora, Anjila Aneja, Neena Bahl, Gupta Ashutosh et al.
Journal of Fetal Medicine
Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics
article

NIPT: Routine versus Considered Options

Rupam Arora, Anjila Aneja, Neena Bahl, Gupta Ashutosh, Nadir Loveleena
article en

Abstract

In addition to yielding positive or negative results, NIPT can occasionally produce inconclusive or nonreportable outcomes, most often due to an insufficient amount of fetal

Journal of Fetal MedicineVol. 11(04)
Fortis Healthcare (IN), Cloudnine (IN), Artemis Hospitals (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 56%
Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics
DOIOpen Access PDFOpenAlex
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

NIPT: Routine versus Considered Options — Rupam Arora, Anjila Aneja, et al. · Journal of Fetal Medicine (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS