Willingness to volunteer among remote workers is insensitive to the team size

Abstract Volunteering is a widespread allocation mechanism in the workplace. It emerges naturally in software development or the generation of online knowledge platforms. Using a field experiment with more than 2,000 workers, we study the effect of team size on volunteering in an online labor market. In contrast to our theoretical predictions and previous research, we find no effect of team size on volunteering, although workers react to free-riding incentives, and volunteering is perceived as costly. Eliciting workers’ beliefs about their co-workers’ volunteering reveals conditional volunteering as the primary driver of our results: Workers tend to volunteer more when they believe that others are volunteering, even when doing so is highly inefficient. Using additional experiments, we identify the importance of the task itself as an essential mitigating factor for those results.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Experimental Economics
Published
2025-04-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1017/eec.2024.13
Primary Topic
Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Willingness to volunteer among remote workers is insensitive to the team size

Adrian Hillenbrand, Fabian Winter, Tobias Werner
1 links
Experimental Economics
Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies
article

Willingness to volunteer among remote workers is insensitive to the team size

Adrian Hillenbrand, Fabian Winter, Tobias Werner
article en

Abstract

Abstract Volunteering is a widespread allocation mechanism in the workplace. It emerges naturally in software development or the generation of online knowledge platforms. Using a field experiment with more than 2,000 workers, we study the effect of team size on volunteering in an online labor market. In contrast to our theoretical predictions and previous research, we find no effect of team size on volunteering, although workers react to free-riding incentives, and volunteering is perceived as costly. Eliciting workers’ beliefs about their co-workers’ volunteering reveals conditional volunteering as the primary driver of our results: Workers tend to volunteer more when they believe that others are volunteering, even when doing so is highly inefficient. Using additional experiments, we identify the importance of the task itself as an essential mitigating factor for those results.

Experimental EconomicsVol. 28(3)
Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (DE), Centre for European Economic Research (DE), University of Zurich (CH), Institute for Biomedical Engineering (CH), Max Planck Institute for Human Development (DE)
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, Leibniz-Gemeinschaft
Openalex Percentile: Top 92%
Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.