The Role of Children's Voices and Feedback Mechanisms in Family Justice

ABSTRACT When parents separate in Australia and in many other jurisdictions, most settle the parenting arrangements for their children between themselves or with the assistance of mediation or other dispute resolution processes. These processes may or may not take much account of children's views. When parents cannot resolve their dispute, there are several mechanisms that can, but do not necessarily, allow children's views to be heard in the decision‐making process—via expert reports and an independent children's lawyer acting on best interests. Using a child rights and procedural justice framework, this article provides a critique of children's participation in family law processes in Australia, particularly when there are allegations of family and domestic violence. These allegations add complexity, and in many cases, further reduce children's effective engagement in the process and their satisfaction with the arrangements. A range of communication and monitoring feedback mechanisms are proposed to encourage children's meaningful participation, increase transparency and promote child‐centred, evidence‐based and recalibrated decision‐making.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Child & Family Social Work
Published
2025-04-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/cfs.13303
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Children's Rights and Participation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.20

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Role of Children's Voices and Feedback Mechanisms in Family Justice

Judy Cashmore
1 citations
Child & Family Social Work
Children's Rights and Participation
4.20
article

The Role of Children's Voices and Feedback Mechanisms in Family Justice

Judy Cashmore
article en
1 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT When parents separate in Australia and in many other jurisdictions, most settle the parenting arrangements for their children between themselves or with the assistance of mediation or other dispute resolution processes. These processes may or may not take much account of children's views. When parents cannot resolve their dispute, there are several mechanisms that can, but do not necessarily, allow children's views to be heard in the decision‐making process—via expert reports and an independent children's lawyer acting on best interests. Using a child rights and procedural justice framework, this article provides a critique of children's participation in family law processes in Australia, particularly when there are allegations of family and domestic violence. These allegations add complexity, and in many cases, further reduce children's effective engagement in the process and their satisfaction with the arrangements. A range of communication and monitoring feedback mechanisms are proposed to encourage children's meaningful participation, increase transparency and promote child‐centred, evidence‐based and recalibrated decision‐making.

Child & Family Social Work
The University of Sydney (AU)
University of Sydney
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Children's Rights and Participation
4.20
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.