Qualitative methods are epidemiologic methods: Revisiting the epidemiologist's toolbox

Qualitative research methods are frequently described as "compatible" with quantitative epidemiologic methods. Instead of simply "compatible," we argue that qualitative methods are epidemiologic methods. Especially in social epidemiology, which embraces the relationships between psychosocial, historical, contextual, and intersectional factors and health, qualitative research methods have the potential to provide a more complete picture of the distribution of health and disease within a population and contexts contributing to population health. To this end, this paper compares qualitative research and epidemiologic research definitions, outlines epidemiologic uses of qualitative data, and addresses common concerns and misconceptions about qualitative research. We emphasize the shared characteristics and champion the use of shared standards across qualitative and quantitative approaches in epidemiology. This article is part of a Special Collection on Methods in Social Epidemiology.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
American Journal of Epidemiology
Published
2025-04-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwaf083
Primary Topic
Obesity and Health Practices
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Qualitative methods are epidemiologic methods: Revisiting the epidemiologist's toolbox

Elisabeth Stelson, Roxanne Dupuis
1 links
American Journal of Epidemiology
Obesity and Health Practices
article

Qualitative methods are epidemiologic methods: Revisiting the epidemiologist's toolbox

Elisabeth Stelson, Roxanne Dupuis
article en

Abstract

Qualitative research methods are frequently described as "compatible" with quantitative epidemiologic methods. Instead of simply "compatible," we argue that qualitative methods are epidemiologic methods. Especially in social epidemiology, which embraces the relationships between psychosocial, historical, contextual, and intersectional factors and health, qualitative research methods have the potential to provide a more complete picture of the distribution of health and disease within a population and contexts contributing to population health. To this end, this paper compares qualitative research and epidemiologic research definitions, outlines epidemiologic uses of qualitative data, and addresses common concerns and misconceptions about qualitative research. We emphasize the shared characteristics and champion the use of shared standards across qualitative and quantitative approaches in epidemiology. This article is part of a Special Collection on Methods in Social Epidemiology.

American Journal of EpidemiologyVol. 195(3)
Harvard University (US), Washington University in St. Louis (US), New York University (US)
National Institutes of Health, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, National Cancer Institute
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 85%
Obesity and Health Practices
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.