Neighborhood characteristics and incident myocardial infarction in US older adults: evaluation in 2 nationwide cohorts

Inconsistent findings on the associations of adverse neighborhood context with myocardial infarction (MI) or racial disparities in MI may reflect publication bias or chance. We compared results from harmonized analyses of the REasons for Geographic and Racial Differences in Stroke (REGARDS, n = 25 196, aged ≥45 years, 42% Black; 2003-2018) study and the Health and Retirement Study (HRS, n = 14 191, aged >50 years, 13% Black; 2004-2018). For both cohorts, we used 51 American Community Survey (ACS) census tract variables to predict hazard of incident MI using Cox models. We evaluated consistency of coefficients and Black-White differences in coefficients between cohorts. Cumulative MI incidence in REGARDS (6.2% over 11.5 years median follow-up) was similar to HRS (7.1% over 13.1 years median follow-up). Of 51 ACS predictors evaluated, the log(HR) for incident MI differed by ≤0.05 between REGARDS and HRS for 34 variables. Of the 12 census tract predictors with significantly different associations with MI for Black versus White respondents in REGARDS, none showed interactions with race in HRS at the P <.05 threshold. Neighborhood socioeconomic associations with MI across 2 national studies were largely replicable. Racial differences in associations were inconsistent.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
American Journal of Epidemiology
Published
2025-04-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwaf091
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Health disparities and outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.33

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Neighborhood characteristics and incident myocardial infarction in US older adults: evaluation in 2 nationwide cohorts

Torsten B. Neilands, M. Maria Glymour, Julene K. Johnson, Kendra D. Sims et al.
2 citations
American Journal of Epidemiology
Health disparities and outcomes
4.33
article

Neighborhood characteristics and incident myocardial infarction in US older adults: evaluation in 2 nationwide cohorts

Torsten B. Neilands, M. Maria Glymour, Julene K. Johnson, Kendra D. Sims, Monika M. Safford, Gina S. Lovasi, Loni Philip Tabb, Suzanne E. Judd, Kirsten Bibbins‐Domingo
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Inconsistent findings on the associations of adverse neighborhood context with myocardial infarction (MI) or racial disparities in MI may reflect publication bias or chance. We compared results from harmonized analyses of the REasons for Geographic and Racial Differences in Stroke (REGARDS, n = 25 196, aged ≥45 years, 42% Black; 2003-2018) study and the Health and Retirement Study (HRS, n = 14 191, aged >50 years, 13% Black; 2004-2018). For both cohorts, we used 51 American Community Survey (ACS) census tract variables to predict hazard of incident MI using Cox models. We evaluated consistency of coefficients and Black-White differences in coefficients between cohorts. Cumulative MI incidence in REGARDS (6.2% over 11.5 years median follow-up) was similar to HRS (7.1% over 13.1 years median follow-up). Of 51 ACS predictors evaluated, the log(HR) for incident MI differed by ≤0.05 between REGARDS and HRS for 34 variables. Of the 12 census tract predictors with significantly different associations with MI for Black versus White respondents in REGARDS, none showed interactions with race in HRS at the P <.05 threshold. Neighborhood socioeconomic associations with MI across 2 national studies were largely replicable. Racial differences in associations were inconsistent.

American Journal of EpidemiologyVol. 194(9)
Boston University (US), American Medical Association (US), University of California, San Francisco (US), Cornell University (US), University of Alabama at Birmingham (US), Institute on Aging (US), Weill Cornell Medicine (US), Drexel University (US), University of San Francisco (US)
National Institutes of Health
No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Health disparities and outcomes
4.33
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.