The Comparative Assessment of Renal Artery Stenosis on Ultrasound and Computed Tomography Angiography in Hypertensive and Normotensive Patients

Background: Renal artery stenosis (RAS) is a significant cause of secondary hypertension and renal dysfunction. Early and accurate detection is crucial for effective management. While computed tomography angiography (CTA) is considered highly reliable, ultrasonography (USG) remains a widely accessible and non-invasive alternative. However, the comparative diagnostic performance of these modalities in hypertensive versus normotensive patients remains an area of interest. Objectives: This study aims to compare the diagnostic accuracy of ultrasonography and CTA in detecting RAS, with a focus on differences between hypertensive and normotensive patients. Additionally, it evaluates the sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values of USG against CTA as the gold standard. Methodology: A cross-sectional study was conducted on 50 patients (divided into hypertensive and normotensive groups) suspected of having RAS. All participants underwent both Doppler ultrasonography and CTA. The degree of stenosis, peak systolic velocity (PSV), and renal-aortic ratio (RAR) were assessed via USG, while CTA provided detailed anatomical evaluation. Statistical analysis, including sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis, was performed. Results: Among 50 patients, 85.7% had significant RAS ≥70% stenosis on CTA. Ultrasonography demonstrated a sensitivity of 57.1% and specificity of 72.7% compared to CTA. Hypertensive patients showed higher PSV and RAR values, correlating strongly with severe stenosis p < 0.001. USG had higher diagnostic accuracy in hypertensive patients (60%) than normotensive ones 40%, though CTA remained superior in detecting mild stenosis. Conclusion: Doppler ultrasonography is a reliable, non-invasive tool for detecting hemodynamically significant RAS, particularly in hypertensive patients, but CTA offers superior precision, especially in early-stage stenosis. Combining both modalities may optimize diagnostic efficacy, with USG serving as an effective initial screening tool.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Indus journal of bioscience research.
Published
2025-04-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.70749/ijbr.v3i4.1166
Primary Topic
Renal and Vascular Pathologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Comparative Assessment of Renal Artery Stenosis on Ultrasound and Computed Tomography Angiography in Hypertensive and Normotensive Patients

Fouzia Farooq, Muhammad Zafar, Arooj Fatima, Mohammad Shahar Yar et al.
Indus journal of bioscience research.
Renal and Vascular Pathologies
article

The Comparative Assessment of Renal Artery Stenosis on Ultrasound and Computed Tomography Angiography in Hypertensive and Normotensive Patients

Fouzia Farooq, Muhammad Zafar, Arooj Fatima, Mohammad Shahar Yar, Loqman Shah, Aleeza Tassadaq, Fatima Mohib
article en

Abstract

Background: Renal artery stenosis (RAS) is a significant cause of secondary hypertension and renal dysfunction. Early and accurate detection is crucial for effective management. While computed tomography angiography (CTA) is considered highly reliable, ultrasonography (USG) remains a widely accessible and non-invasive alternative. However, the comparative diagnostic performance of these modalities in hypertensive versus normotensive patients remains an area of interest. Objectives: This study aims to compare the diagnostic accuracy of ultrasonography and CTA in detecting RAS, with a focus on differences between hypertensive and normotensive patients. Additionally, it evaluates the sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values of USG against CTA as the gold standard. Methodology: A cross-sectional study was conducted on 50 patients (divided into hypertensive and normotensive groups) suspected of having RAS. All participants underwent both Doppler ultrasonography and CTA. The degree of stenosis, peak systolic velocity (PSV), and renal-aortic ratio (RAR) were assessed via USG, while CTA provided detailed anatomical evaluation. Statistical analysis, including sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis, was performed. Results: Among 50 patients, 85.7% had significant RAS ≥70% stenosis on CTA. Ultrasonography demonstrated a sensitivity of 57.1% and specificity of 72.7% compared to CTA. Hypertensive patients showed higher PSV and RAR values, correlating strongly with severe stenosis p < 0.001. USG had higher diagnostic accuracy in hypertensive patients (60%) than normotensive ones 40%, though CTA remained superior in detecting mild stenosis. Conclusion: Doppler ultrasonography is a reliable, non-invasive tool for detecting hemodynamically significant RAS, particularly in hypertensive patients, but CTA offers superior precision, especially in early-stage stenosis. Combining both modalities may optimize diagnostic efficacy, with USG serving as an effective initial screening tool.

Indus journal of bioscience research.Vol. 3(4)
Superior University (PK)
Openalex Percentile: Top 86%
Renal and Vascular Pathologies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.