Revival of Innovation Failures in R&D‐Intensive Environments—A Case Study From a Japanese Chemical Company

ABSTRACT Failure is the most likely outcome of any innovation project, even within well‐established firms. However, the failure of an innovation does not necessarily mark the end of its life cycle, as it can be revived. The existing literature primarily discusses two distinct revival approaches: external, involving a spin‐out to external parties while retaining limited ownership of the innovation, or internal, occurring through accidental constellations, also known as serendipity. In this study we explore a third approach, which involves a deliberate revival process while preserving the innovation's value within firm boundaries. We investigate these innovation failure revivals through three embedded cases of a Japanese R&D‐intensive chemical company that has successfully revived multiple failed innovation projects. The study finds that the intertemporal transferability of a technology is largely determined during its development phase, making ‘technology elaboration’ a critical prerequisite for successful revival. Additionally, firms must complement internal revival efforts with external exploratory processes, integrating absorptive capacity (AC) with transformative capacity (TC) to identify new opportunities and acquire external resources. We further identify a key enabler of intertemporal technology transfer: a technology commitment decision that precedes the selection of technologies to maintain, ensuring a structured selection process over time. Finally, we demonstrate that TC enables not only the transfer of previously successful or shelved technologies but also those from failed innovation attempts, provided they are designated as strategically important “core” technologies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
R and D Management
Published
2025-04-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/radm.12774
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Innovation and Knowledge Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.23

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Revival of Innovation Failures in R&D‐Intensive Environments—A Case Study From a Japanese Chemical Company

Ryo Taniguchi, Péter Popovics
1 citations
R and D Management
Innovation and Knowledge Management
2.23
article

Revival of Innovation Failures in R&D‐Intensive Environments—A Case Study From a Japanese Chemical Company

Ryo Taniguchi, Péter Popovics
article en
1 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT Failure is the most likely outcome of any innovation project, even within well‐established firms. However, the failure of an innovation does not necessarily mark the end of its life cycle, as it can be revived. The existing literature primarily discusses two distinct revival approaches: external, involving a spin‐out to external parties while retaining limited ownership of the innovation, or internal, occurring through accidental constellations, also known as serendipity. In this study we explore a third approach, which involves a deliberate revival process while preserving the innovation's value within firm boundaries. We investigate these innovation failure revivals through three embedded cases of a Japanese R&D‐intensive chemical company that has successfully revived multiple failed innovation projects. The study finds that the intertemporal transferability of a technology is largely determined during its development phase, making ‘technology elaboration’ a critical prerequisite for successful revival. Additionally, firms must complement internal revival efforts with external exploratory processes, integrating absorptive capacity (AC) with transformative capacity (TC) to identify new opportunities and acquire external resources. We further identify a key enabler of intertemporal technology transfer: a technology commitment decision that precedes the selection of technologies to maintain, ensuring a structured selection process over time. Finally, we demonstrate that TC enables not only the transfer of previously successful or shelved technologies but also those from failed innovation attempts, provided they are designated as strategically important “core” technologies.

R and D ManagementVol. 55(5)
Hitotsubashi University (JP), Meiji University (JP), Copenhagen Business School (DK)
Meiji University, Great Britain Sasakawa Foundation, Japan Society for the Promotion of Science
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Innovation and Knowledge Management
2.23
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.