<scp>PRRT</scp> plus holmium‐166‐<scp>SIRT</scp> (<scp>HEPAR PLuS</scp>) versus <scp>PRRT</scp>‐only in patients with metastatic neuroendocrine tumors: A propensity‐score matched analysis

Patients with bulky neuroendocrine liver metastases (NELM) undergoing PRRT with [<sup>177</sup>Lu]Lu-DOTATATE have a worse survival than patients with limited liver metastases. Previously, the safety and efficacy of additional selective internal radiotherapy (SIRT), using holmium-166 (<sup>166</sup>Ho)-microspheres, directly following PRRT in patients with NELM were confirmed in the prospective HEPAR PLuS study. The aim of the current study was to provide insight into the efficacy and survival benefit of PRRT + <sup>166</sup>Ho-SIRT over PRRT-only by means of a propensity score matched historical cohort. A multicenter retrospective data collection was performed to match patients treated with PRRT-only to the prospectively collected HEPAR PLuS study patients. Demographic, clinical, laboratory, and imaging data were collected. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients with progression-free survival (PFS) at 2 years after the start of PRRT. Secondary endpoints included the proportion of patients with 2-year hepatic PFS (hPFS), general PFS and hPFS, objective response rates (ORR), and overall survival (OS). Twenty-four patients were 1:1 matched and included in the analysis. All key matching criteria were balanced between cohorts if feasible. The proportion of patients with PFS and hPFS at 2 years was 68% and 82% after PRRT + <sup>166</sup>Ho-SIRT versus 55% and 50% after PRRT only. Time to median PFS was comparable (31 vs. 30 months). An initial delay in hepatic progression or death of any cause was observed in PRRT + <sup>166</sup>Ho-SIRT mNET patients (75% probability of PFS at 27 vs. 22 months), most notably in intestinal tumors (75% probability of PFS at 26 vs. 15 months). Best ORR was 71% after PRRT + <sup>166</sup>Ho-SIRT versus 25% after PRRT only. This study showed that <sup>166</sup>Ho-SIRT after PRRT (vs. PRRT-only) had a positive effect on the liver disease progression in patients with NELM, increasing the 2-year hPFS rate and tumor response and delaying hepatic progression or death. However, this effect did not translate into improving general PFS and OS.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Neuroendocrinology
Published
2025-04-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/jne.70034
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Neuroendocrine Tumor Research Advances
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.71

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

PRRT plus holmium‐166‐SIRT (HEPAR PLuS) versus PRRT‐only in patients with metastatic neuroendocrine tumors: A propensity‐score matched analysis

Margot Tesselaar, Daphne M. V. de Vries–Huizing, Thomas Walter, Jens Theysohn et al.
2 citations
Journal of Neuroendocrinology
Neuroendocrine Tumor Research Advances
2.71
article

PRRT plus holmium‐166‐SIRT (HEPAR PLuS) versus PRRT‐only in patients with metastatic neuroendocrine tumors: A propensity‐score matched analysis

Margot Tesselaar, Daphne M. V. de Vries–Huizing, Thomas Walter, Jens Theysohn, Harald Lahner, Laurent Milot, H. Lanzafame, Wouter B. Veldhuis, Boumediene Lachachi, Roland Jong, Arthur J. A. T. Braat, Larissa W. van Golen, Eline D Ekkelenkamp, Sarah Barton, M. E. G. H. Lam
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Patients with bulky neuroendocrine liver metastases (NELM) undergoing PRRT with [<sup>177</sup>Lu]Lu-DOTATATE have a worse survival than patients with limited liver metastases. Previously, the safety and efficacy of additional selective internal radiotherapy (SIRT), using holmium-166 (<sup>166</sup>Ho)-microspheres, directly following PRRT in patients with NELM were confirmed in the prospective HEPAR PLuS study. The aim of the current study was to provide insight into the efficacy and survival benefit of PRRT + <sup>166</sup>Ho-SIRT over PRRT-only by means of a propensity score matched historical cohort. A multicenter retrospective data collection was performed to match patients treated with PRRT-only to the prospectively collected HEPAR PLuS study patients. Demographic, clinical, laboratory, and imaging data were collected. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients with progression-free survival (PFS) at 2 years after the start of PRRT. Secondary endpoints included the proportion of patients with 2-year hepatic PFS (hPFS), general PFS and hPFS, objective response rates (ORR), and overall survival (OS). Twenty-four patients were 1:1 matched and included in the analysis. All key matching criteria were balanced between cohorts if feasible. The proportion of patients with PFS and hPFS at 2 years was 68% and 82% after PRRT + <sup>166</sup>Ho-SIRT versus 55% and 50% after PRRT only. Time to median PFS was comparable (31 vs. 30 months). An initial delay in hepatic progression or death of any cause was observed in PRRT + <sup>166</sup>Ho-SIRT mNET patients (75% probability of PFS at 27 vs. 22 months), most notably in intestinal tumors (75% probability of PFS at 26 vs. 15 months). Best ORR was 71% after PRRT + <sup>166</sup>Ho-SIRT versus 25% after PRRT only. This study showed that <sup>166</sup>Ho-SIRT after PRRT (vs. PRRT-only) had a positive effect on the liver disease progression in patients with NELM, increasing the 2-year hPFS rate and tumor response and delaying hepatic progression or death. However, this effect did not translate into improving general PFS and OS.

Journal of NeuroendocrinologyVol. 37(8)
The Netherlands Cancer Institute (NL), University Medical Center Utrecht (NL), Hospices Civils de Lyon (FR), Terumo (Belgium) (BE), University of Duisburg-Essen (DE)
Terumo
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Neuroendocrine Tumor Research Advances
2.71
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.