A COMPARATIVE STUDY ON SAFETY, EFFICACY AND PHARMACOTHERAPEUTIC ADHERENCE OF DESVENLAFAXINE VERSUS ESCITALOPRAM IN DEPRESSION AT A TERTIARY CARE TEACHING HOSPITAL

INTRODUCTIONMajor Depressive Disorder (MDD) is a prevalent mental health condition, with pharmacological treatments like Escitalopram (SSRI) and Desvenlafaxine (SNRI) being widely used. This study compared their efficacy, safety, adherence and metabolic effects in MDD patients. OBJECTIVESThe primary objective was to evaluate depressive symptom reduction using the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAM-D) over 16 weeks. Secondary objectives included assessing lipid profiles, platelet counts, adverse effects and adherence. METHODSThis prospective observational study included 203 MDD patients (Escitalopram: n=105; Desvenlafaxine: n=98). HAM-D scores, lipid profiles, and platelet counts were evaluated at baseline and week 16. Adverse effects were monitored throughout the study. RESULTSBoth treatments significantly reduced HAM-D scores (p < 0.001), with Escitalopram showing greater improvement at all time points (p < 0.001). Escitalopram improved lipid profiles, reducing TC (p < 0.001), TG (p < 0.001), and VLDL (p < 0.001), while increasing HDL (p < 0.001). LDL remained unchanged (p = 0.842). Desvenlafaxine increased TC (p < 0.001) and VLDL (p < 0.001) but also raised HDL (p < 0.001), with no significant changes in TG (p = 0.954) or LDL (p = 0.839). Platelet counts decreased slightly with Escitalopram (p = 0.012) but remained stable with Desvenlafaxine (p = 0.806). Adverse effects were more frequent with Desvenlafaxine (9.2% at 4 weeks) than Escitalopram (6.7%). CONCLUSIONEscitalopram demonstrated superior efficacy in reducing depressive symptoms and a more favourable impact on lipid profiles compared to Desvenlafaxine, which had a higher incidence of adverse effects. Escitalopram is preferable for MDD patients with metabolic concerns, while Desvenlafaxine remains a viable alternative with careful monitoring. Individualized treatment strategies are essential for optimal MDD management.

Authors

Publication Details

Published
2025-04-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.53555/4ct2dy36
Primary Topic
Treatment of Major Depression
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A COMPARATIVE STUDY ON SAFETY, EFFICACY AND PHARMACOTHERAPEUTIC ADHERENCE OF DESVENLAFAXINE VERSUS ESCITALOPRAM IN DEPRESSION AT A TERTIARY CARE TEACHING HOSPITAL

BK Shoraisham
Treatment of Major Depression
article

A COMPARATIVE STUDY ON SAFETY, EFFICACY AND PHARMACOTHERAPEUTIC ADHERENCE OF DESVENLAFAXINE VERSUS ESCITALOPRAM IN DEPRESSION AT A TERTIARY CARE TEACHING HOSPITAL

BK Shoraisham
article en

Abstract

INTRODUCTIONMajor Depressive Disorder (MDD) is a prevalent mental health condition, with pharmacological treatments like Escitalopram (SSRI) and Desvenlafaxine (SNRI) being widely used. This study compared their efficacy, safety, adherence and metabolic effects in MDD patients. OBJECTIVESThe primary objective was to evaluate depressive symptom reduction using the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAM-D) over 16 weeks. Secondary objectives included assessing lipid profiles, platelet counts, adverse effects and adherence. METHODSThis prospective observational study included 203 MDD patients (Escitalopram: n=105; Desvenlafaxine: n=98). HAM-D scores, lipid profiles, and platelet counts were evaluated at baseline and week 16. Adverse effects were monitored throughout the study. RESULTSBoth treatments significantly reduced HAM-D scores (p < 0.001), with Escitalopram showing greater improvement at all time points (p < 0.001). Escitalopram improved lipid profiles, reducing TC (p < 0.001), TG (p < 0.001), and VLDL (p < 0.001), while increasing HDL (p < 0.001). LDL remained unchanged (p = 0.842). Desvenlafaxine increased TC (p < 0.001) and VLDL (p < 0.001) but also raised HDL (p < 0.001), with no significant changes in TG (p = 0.954) or LDL (p = 0.839). Platelet counts decreased slightly with Escitalopram (p = 0.012) but remained stable with Desvenlafaxine (p = 0.806). Adverse effects were more frequent with Desvenlafaxine (9.2% at 4 weeks) than Escitalopram (6.7%). CONCLUSIONEscitalopram demonstrated superior efficacy in reducing depressive symptoms and a more favourable impact on lipid profiles compared to Desvenlafaxine, which had a higher incidence of adverse effects. Escitalopram is preferable for MDD patients with metabolic concerns, while Desvenlafaxine remains a viable alternative with careful monitoring. Individualized treatment strategies are essential for optimal MDD management.

Openalex Percentile: Top 89%
Treatment of Major Depression
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.