Pull-Out Tests of Headed Studs Embedded in Steel Fiber–Reinforced Geopolymer Concrete

This work experimentally analyzes the behavior of studs, with different head thicknesses and embedded depths, centrally anchored in concrete blocks subjected to the direct pull-out test. Sixteen blocks with dimensions of 400 mm×400 mm×250 mm were cast, four of which were made with conventional concrete (CC), four with steel fiber–reinforced concrete (SFRC), four with geopolymer concrete (GPC), and four with steel fiber–reinforced geopolymer concrete (SFRGPC). Metakaolin was used as a precursor and sodium hydroxide (NaOH) and sodium silicate (Na2SiO3) as activators. The volume fraction of fibers was 1.0%, and the compressive strength was ∼35 MPa. The results were analyzed regarding gain in failure load, displacements, and failure modes. The results showed that the geopolymer with steel fibers can be applied to concrete structures since the elements tested showed superior mechanical behavior to conventional concrete. The SFRC and SFRGPC blocks showed a significant increase in failure load. However, SFRGPC showed higher failure load results than SFRC, and the same behavior occurred between GPC and CC.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of structural design and construction practice.
Published
2025-04-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1061/jsdccc.sceng-1794
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Innovative concrete reinforcement materials
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.95
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Pull-Out Tests of Headed Studs Embedded in Steel Fiber–Reinforced Geopolymer Concrete

Aaron Kadima Lukanu Lwa Nzambi, Dênio Ramam Carvalho de Oliveira, Marcelo Carlos Maia dos Santos
1 citations
Journal of structural design and construction practice.
Innovative concrete reinforcement materials
0.95
article

Pull-Out Tests of Headed Studs Embedded in Steel Fiber–Reinforced Geopolymer Concrete

Aaron Kadima Lukanu Lwa Nzambi, Dênio Ramam Carvalho de Oliveira, Marcelo Carlos Maia dos Santos
article en
1 citations

Abstract

This work experimentally analyzes the behavior of studs, with different head thicknesses and embedded depths, centrally anchored in concrete blocks subjected to the direct pull-out test. Sixteen blocks with dimensions of 400 mm×400 mm×250 mm were cast, four of which were made with conventional concrete (CC), four with steel fiber–reinforced concrete (SFRC), four with geopolymer concrete (GPC), and four with steel fiber–reinforced geopolymer concrete (SFRGPC). Metakaolin was used as a precursor and sodium hydroxide (NaOH) and sodium silicate (Na2SiO3) as activators. The volume fraction of fibers was 1.0%, and the compressive strength was ∼35 MPa. The results were analyzed regarding gain in failure load, displacements, and failure modes. The results showed that the geopolymer with steel fibers can be applied to concrete structures since the elements tested showed superior mechanical behavior to conventional concrete. The SFRC and SFRGPC blocks showed a significant increase in failure load. However, SFRGPC showed higher failure load results than SFRC, and the same behavior occurred between GPC and CC.

Journal of structural design and construction practice.Vol. 30(3)
Universidade Federal do Pará (BR)
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 26%
Innovative concrete reinforcement materials
0.95
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Pull-Out Tests of Headed Studs Embedded in Steel Fiber–Reinforced Geopolymer Concrete — Aaron Kadima Lukanu Lwa Nzambi, Dênio Ramam Carvalho de Oliveira, et al. · Journal of structural design and construction practice. (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS