Forum 10: Dealing with Frankenstein

In 1818, Mary Shelly wrote the novel ‘Frankenstein; or The Modern Prometheus’ Frankenstein was the name of the doctor who takes body parts from the graveyard, sutures them together and electrocutes the corpse to life. Ironically, people call the monster the doctor’s name instead. Adam’s (the created) goal is to find meaning to its life. Dr. Frankenstein offers no answer and instead gloats at his success in creating life. Adam then finds meaning in destroying the doctor and his family then leaving into the Artic wastes. Krusen and Rusk are the forefathers of Physiatry. To do their work, reconstruction aids were trained. In other places, nurses took up the role or gymnastic teachers. This has grown into a plethora of therapist courses. An overwhelming feature of these paramedical courses is the minimisation of basic sciences while focusing on technical skills. Graduates then stay subservient or seek to fill their curiosity by entering higher levels of training. These paramedical services are not cures but supplements or palliative measures. Because the cause is not being treated a cure is not expected by the clinician ordering it. This is not true for the patient suffering though. In this way, paramedicals have grabbed acupuncture, yoga, etc. to stay relevant. Physiatrists of yore created this problem by leaving them unsupervised. This nonsense still goes on in some places. As paramedicals have expanded outside of our area into other departments, they now have a free hand to dictate terms to doctors who are clueless about what they can and should do. These doctors often believe a physiatrist simply writes therapy orders, which most any fool can do. In the worst, they see themselves as liberators of the oppressed therapist. As they lack exposure to actual rehabilitation, their ignorance is excusable. The lack of curiosity and respect for our discipline is not. Scope creep happening. Frankenstein is empowered with every step. The question remains. What is the solution? Now open is the forum. Responses meet the quorum! Do so with decorum. Silence is not aurum.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Indian Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
Published
2025-04-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.4103/ijpmr.ijpmr_11_24
Primary Topic
Science Education and Perceptions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Forum 10: Dealing with Frankenstein

Ravi Sankaran
Indian Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
Science Education and Perceptions
article

Forum 10: Dealing with Frankenstein

Ravi Sankaran
article en

Abstract

In 1818, Mary Shelly wrote the novel ‘Frankenstein; or The Modern Prometheus’ Frankenstein was the name of the doctor who takes body parts from the graveyard, sutures them together and electrocutes the corpse to life. Ironically, people call the monster the doctor’s name instead. Adam’s (the created) goal is to find meaning to its life. Dr. Frankenstein offers no answer and instead gloats at his success in creating life. Adam then finds meaning in destroying the doctor and his family then leaving into the Artic wastes. Krusen and Rusk are the forefathers of Physiatry. To do their work, reconstruction aids were trained. In other places, nurses took up the role or gymnastic teachers. This has grown into a plethora of therapist courses. An overwhelming feature of these paramedical courses is the minimisation of basic sciences while focusing on technical skills. Graduates then stay subservient or seek to fill their curiosity by entering higher levels of training. These paramedical services are not cures but supplements or palliative measures. Because the cause is not being treated a cure is not expected by the clinician ordering it. This is not true for the patient suffering though. In this way, paramedicals have grabbed acupuncture, yoga, etc. to stay relevant. Physiatrists of yore created this problem by leaving them unsupervised. This nonsense still goes on in some places. As paramedicals have expanded outside of our area into other departments, they now have a free hand to dictate terms to doctors who are clueless about what they can and should do. These doctors often believe a physiatrist simply writes therapy orders, which most any fool can do. In the worst, they see themselves as liberators of the oppressed therapist. As they lack exposure to actual rehabilitation, their ignorance is excusable. The lack of curiosity and respect for our discipline is not. Scope creep happening. Frankenstein is empowered with every step. The question remains. What is the solution? Now open is the forum. Responses meet the quorum! Do so with decorum. Silence is not aurum.

Indian Journal of Physical Medicine and RehabilitationVol. 35(2)
Amrita Institute of Medical Sciences and Research Centre (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 91%
Science Education and Perceptions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Forum 10: Dealing with Frankenstein — Ravi Sankaran · Indian Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS