Validation of automated paper screening for esophagectomy systematic review using large language models

This study demonstrates promising use of LLMs to streamline the workflow of systematic reviews. The integration of LLMs in systematic reviews could lead to significant time and cost savings, however caution must be taken for reviews involving stringent a narrower and exclusion criterion. Future research is needed and should explore integrating LLMs in other steps of the systematic review, such as full text screening or data extraction, and compare different LLMs for their effectiveness in various types of systematic reviews.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PeerJ Computer Science
Published
2025-04-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj-cs.2822
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Esophageal Cancer Research and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.01
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Validation of automated paper screening for esophagectomy systematic review using large language models

Jamie Strain, Rashi Ramchandani, Daniel M. Jones, William Klement et al.
1 citations
PeerJ Computer Science
Esophageal Cancer Research and Treatment
2.01
article

Validation of automated paper screening for esophagectomy systematic review using large language models

Jamie Strain, Rashi Ramchandani, Daniel M. Jones, William Klement, Risa Shorr, Eddie Guo, Erin Williams, Sébastien Gilbert, J. Bhupender Singh Rathod, Esra Rakab
article en
1 citations

Abstract

This study demonstrates promising use of LLMs to streamline the workflow of systematic reviews. The integration of LLMs in systematic reviews could lead to significant time and cost savings, however caution must be taken for reviews involving stringent a narrower and exclusion criterion. Future research is needed and should explore integrating LLMs in other steps of the systematic review, such as full text screening or data extraction, and compare different LLMs for their effectiveness in various types of systematic reviews.

PeerJ Computer ScienceVol. 11
Dalhousie University (CA), University of Ottawa (CA), University of Calgary (CA), University of Toronto (CA), Ottawa Hospital (CA), Ottawa Hospital Research Institute (CA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 16%
Esophageal Cancer Research and Treatment
2.01
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Validation of automated paper screening for esophagectomy systematic review using large language models — Jamie Strain, Rashi Ramchandani, et al. · PeerJ Computer Science (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS