Triple‐Phase Boundaries Enable Selective Urea Production From Simulated Flue Gas in a Zero‐Gap Electrolyzer

Abstract Renewable energy‐powered co‐electrolysis of CO 2 and NO 3 − offers a promising pathway toward sustainable urea production. However, achieving high urea selectivity is challenging due to substantial competing side reactions. Here, we show that engendering a high density of CO 2 bubbles on the catalyst surface creates numerous triple‐phase boundaries that are key toward enhancing CO 2 versus NO 3 − availability for selective urea production. We implemented this strategy using a bipolar membrane in a zero‐gap electrolyzer, which allows for the in situ conversion of (bi)carbonate to CO 2 bubbles at the catalyst/electrolyte interface. Notably, we demonstrate that this electrolyzer system can utilize simulated flue gas (20% CO 2 + 5% O 2 ) for urea production. With a Cu 95 Ru 5 catalyst, we achieve a urea Faradaic efficiency of 58% at 2 V full‐cell voltage over an extended 30‐h period and a peak production rate of 35.46 mmol h −1 g cat −1 . Under these conditions, the Faradaic efficiency to hydrogen evolution and nitrate reduction are 14.7% and 21.6%, respectively. Strikingly, these results with simulated flue gas are comparable to previously reported systems that employ pure CO 2 . Our results introduce a simple yet effective design approach toward developing efficient electrolyzer systems for urea production.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Angewandte Chemie
Published
2025-04-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/ange.202505987
Primary Topic
Ammonia Synthesis and Nitrogen Reduction
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Triple‐Phase Boundaries Enable Selective Urea Production From Simulated Flue Gas in a Zero‐Gap Electrolyzer

Jinfeng Jia, Wan Ru Leow, Yu‐Chia Chang, Yanwei Lum et al.
Angewandte Chemie
Ammonia Synthesis and Nitrogen Reduction
article

Triple‐Phase Boundaries Enable Selective Urea Production From Simulated Flue Gas in a Zero‐Gap Electrolyzer

Jinfeng Jia, Wan Ru Leow, Yu‐Chia Chang, Yanwei Lum, Qin Yang, Chuping Luo, Sung‐Fu Hung, Zainul Aabdin, Shuo Chen, Meng Wang, Mingsheng Zhang, Sibo Wang, Jiguang Zhang, Ziyu Mi, Ping Luo, Ruoou Yang, Yu-Ting Chueh
article en

Abstract

Abstract Renewable energy‐powered co‐electrolysis of CO 2 and NO 3 − offers a promising pathway toward sustainable urea production. However, achieving high urea selectivity is challenging due to substantial competing side reactions. Here, we show that engendering a high density of CO 2 bubbles on the catalyst surface creates numerous triple‐phase boundaries that are key toward enhancing CO 2 versus NO 3 − availability for selective urea production. We implemented this strategy using a bipolar membrane in a zero‐gap electrolyzer, which allows for the in situ conversion of (bi)carbonate to CO 2 bubbles at the catalyst/electrolyte interface. Notably, we demonstrate that this electrolyzer system can utilize simulated flue gas (20% CO 2 + 5% O 2 ) for urea production. With a Cu 95 Ru 5 catalyst, we achieve a urea Faradaic efficiency of 58% at 2 V full‐cell voltage over an extended 30‐h period and a peak production rate of 35.46 mmol h −1 g cat −1 . Under these conditions, the Faradaic efficiency to hydrogen evolution and nitrate reduction are 14.7% and 21.6%, respectively. Strikingly, these results with simulated flue gas are comparable to previously reported systems that employ pure CO 2 . Our results introduce a simple yet effective design approach toward developing efficient electrolyzer systems for urea production.

Angewandte ChemieVol. 137(28)
Agency for Science, Technology and Research (SG), National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University (TW), National University of Singapore (SG), National Synchrotron Radiation Research Center (TW), Université Bourgogne Franche-Comté (FR), Institute of Materials Research and Engineering (SG)
Openalex Percentile: Top 96%
Ammonia Synthesis and Nitrogen Reduction
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.