Low-voltage-area ablation for persistent atrial fibrillation: a randomized controlled trial

Low-voltage areas (LVAs) in the left atrium may promote atrial fibrillation (AF), but the efficacy of LVA ablation for preventing arrhythmia has not been determined. In the present study, we carried out a multicenter, randomized controlled trial (SUPPRESS-AF) to investigate the efficacy of LVA ablation in patients with persistent AF who had left atrial LVAs. Patients with persistent AF and left atrial LVAs that covered ≥5 cm<sup>2</sup> of the left atrial surface on a voltage map after pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) were randomized to undergo LVA ablation (PVI + LVA-ABL group) or not (PVI-alone group) in a 1:1 fashion. Recurrence of AF or atrial tachycardia (AT) was monitored using 24-h Holter electrocardiography (ECG) and twice-daily portable ECG recordings. The primary endpoint was freedom from AF or AT recurrence without antiarrhythmic drug use during 1 year of follow-up. Of 1,347 patients (1,003 males and 344 females) who underwent initial ablation for AF, patients with left atrial LVAs were assigned to the PVI + LVA-ABL (n = 170) or the PVI-alone group (n = 171). Although the PVI + LVA-ABL group demonstrated a numerically higher rate of freedom from AF or AT recurrence compared with the PVI-alone group (61% (95% confidence interval (CI) = 53-68%) versus 50% (95% CI = 42-57%)), this difference did not reach statistical significance (P for log(rank) test = 0.127). There was no difference in the procedure-related serious adverse events between the two groups (1.7% versus 1.8%, P < 0.0001). In conclusion, LVA ablation in addition to PVI did not significantly reduce 1-year AF or AT recurrence in patients with persistent AF with left atrial LVAs. Future studies are needed to identify patients who may receive greater benefit from LVA ablation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Nature Medicine
Published
2025-04-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-025-03674-y
Citations
30
Primary Topic
Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
41.65

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Low-voltage-area ablation for persistent atrial fibrillation: a randomized controlled trial

Tomomi Yamada, Nobuaki Tanaka, Takashi Kanda, Tomoko Minamisaka et al.
30 citations
Nature Medicine
Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes
41.65
article

Low-voltage-area ablation for persistent atrial fibrillation: a randomized controlled trial

Tomomi Yamada, Nobuaki Tanaka, Takashi Kanda, Tomoko Minamisaka, Hitoshi Minamiguchi, Tetsuya Watanabe, Tomoharu Dohi, Yasushi Sakata, Yasuyuki Egami, Yohei Sotomi, Shungo Hikoso, Masaharu Masuda, Masato Okada, Akihiro Sunaga, Masato Kawasaki, Yasuhiro Matsuda, Koichi Inoue, Takafumi Oka
article en
30 citations

Abstract

Low-voltage areas (LVAs) in the left atrium may promote atrial fibrillation (AF), but the efficacy of LVA ablation for preventing arrhythmia has not been determined. In the present study, we carried out a multicenter, randomized controlled trial (SUPPRESS-AF) to investigate the efficacy of LVA ablation in patients with persistent AF who had left atrial LVAs. Patients with persistent AF and left atrial LVAs that covered ≥5 cm<sup>2</sup> of the left atrial surface on a voltage map after pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) were randomized to undergo LVA ablation (PVI + LVA-ABL group) or not (PVI-alone group) in a 1:1 fashion. Recurrence of AF or atrial tachycardia (AT) was monitored using 24-h Holter electrocardiography (ECG) and twice-daily portable ECG recordings. The primary endpoint was freedom from AF or AT recurrence without antiarrhythmic drug use during 1 year of follow-up. Of 1,347 patients (1,003 males and 344 females) who underwent initial ablation for AF, patients with left atrial LVAs were assigned to the PVI + LVA-ABL (n = 170) or the PVI-alone group (n = 171). Although the PVI + LVA-ABL group demonstrated a numerically higher rate of freedom from AF or AT recurrence compared with the PVI-alone group (61% (95% confidence interval (CI) = 53-68%) versus 50% (95% CI = 42-57%)), this difference did not reach statistical significance (P for log(rank) test = 0.127). There was no difference in the procedure-related serious adverse events between the two groups (1.7% versus 1.8%, P < 0.0001). In conclusion, LVA ablation in addition to PVI did not significantly reduce 1-year AF or AT recurrence in patients with persistent AF with left atrial LVAs. Future studies are needed to identify patients who may receive greater benefit from LVA ablation.

Nature MedicineVol. 31(5)
Osaka Prefectural Medical Center (JP), Osaka National Hospital (JP), Osaka City General Hospital (JP), Osaka Rosai Hospital (JP), Kansai Rosai Hospital (JP), Sakurabashi Watanabe Hospital (JP), Nara Medical University (JP), The University of Osaka (JP)
Biosense Webster
Openalex Percentile: Top 0%
Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes
41.65
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.