Conquest and Culture: Exploring Colonial Ideologies in Shakespeare and Marlowe
This paper explores the representation of colonialism in the works of William Shakespeare and Christopher Marlowe, focusing on The Tempest, Othello, Tamburlaine the Great, and Doctor Faustus. Using postcolonial theoretical frameworks, the study investigates how these plays both reflect and critique early modern England’s imperial ambitions. Marlowe’s Tamburlaine and Doctor Faustus depict the era’s expansionist drive, examining themes of power, conquest, and cultural dominance. Meanwhile, Shakespeare’s The Tempest and Othello engage with the complexities of colonial encounters, exposing the tensions between colonisers and the colonised, as well as the psychological and social consequences of imperial rule. The analysis highlights how these texts reveal anxieties surrounding race, identity, and authority within imperial discourse. By situating these works within broader postcolonial debates, this paper underscores their continued relevance to discussions on empire, cultural hegemony, and resistance. Additionally, the study addresses critical gaps in existing scholarship by offering fresh perspectives on colonial subtexts in Marlowe’s works and re-evaluating dominant interpretations of Shakespeare’s engagement with imperialism. The discussion also considers how these plays anticipate later colonial and postcolonial critiques, illustrating their enduring significance in shaping literary and historical narratives of empire. The paper concludes by suggesting avenues for further research, including comparative studies with other European literature of the period and contemporary reinterpretations of colonial themes in modern drama and performance.
Authors
- Akram Shalghin (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9093-168X)
Institutions
- Jadara University (JO)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Forum for Linguistic Studies
- Published
- 2025-04-11
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.30564/fls.v7i4.7767
- Primary Topic
- Philippine History and Culture
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00