Religious centrality across 22 countries

Religious Centrality has been widely studied in Europe and North America and is generally associated with better psychological and social outcomes. Religious centrality is often assessed as a measure of intrinsic religiosity (IR)-religion as one's guiding approach to life - and has been widely validated in societies around the world. However, most studies of religious centrality/IR are cross-sectional and use samples from 'Western' societies or samples from single non-European societies. Moreover, most samples are not nationally representative. Systematic comparisons are difficult because the samples, measures, and procedures vary between studies. This article examines religious centrality across 22 nationally representative samples from religiously diverse countries from the 1<sup>st</sup> wave of the Global Flourishing Study (GFS) using a single-item IR measure and identical demographic measures and methods in each country. The study will serve as the foundation for longitudinal studies designed to assess the causal impact of religious centrality on human flourishing. In the current study, we find societies range widely, with religious centrality lowest in Europe and East Asia, moderate in the Americas and Israel, and highest in Africa and the rest of Asia. We discuss the complexities of assessing religious centrality across religious traditions, how the demographic factors associated with religious centrality vary between countries, and provide implications for secularization theory as well as theories of human flourishing.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Reports
Published
2025-04-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-99183-6
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
6.50

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Religious centrality across 22 countries

Byron R. Johnson, Robert D. Woodberry, Tyler J. VanderWeele, Matt Bradshaw et al.
3 citations
Scientific Reports
Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology
6.50
article

Religious centrality across 22 countries

Byron R. Johnson, Robert D. Woodberry, Tyler J. VanderWeele, Matt Bradshaw, Kathryn A. Johnson, Brendan Case
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Religious Centrality has been widely studied in Europe and North America and is generally associated with better psychological and social outcomes. Religious centrality is often assessed as a measure of intrinsic religiosity (IR)-religion as one's guiding approach to life - and has been widely validated in societies around the world. However, most studies of religious centrality/IR are cross-sectional and use samples from 'Western' societies or samples from single non-European societies. Moreover, most samples are not nationally representative. Systematic comparisons are difficult because the samples, measures, and procedures vary between studies. This article examines religious centrality across 22 nationally representative samples from religiously diverse countries from the 1<sup>st</sup> wave of the Global Flourishing Study (GFS) using a single-item IR measure and identical demographic measures and methods in each country. The study will serve as the foundation for longitudinal studies designed to assess the causal impact of religious centrality on human flourishing. In the current study, we find societies range widely, with religious centrality lowest in Europe and East Asia, moderate in the Americas and Israel, and highest in Africa and the rest of Asia. We discuss the complexities of assessing religious centrality across religious traditions, how the demographic factors associated with religious centrality vary between countries, and provide implications for secularization theory as well as theories of human flourishing.

Scientific ReportsVol. 15(1)
Harvard University (US), Baylor University (US), Quantitative BioSciences (US), Arizona State University (US)
John Templeton Foundation, Fetzer Institute, Templeton World Charity Foundation, Templeton Religion Trust
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology
6.50
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.