Big Data and Manuscript Studies: An Introduction with Some Reflections on Methods

Abstract: This introduction considers the approaches to, reasons for, and impacts of using “big data” methods to study medieval manuscripts. This introduction to “big data” and manuscript studies offers a brief history of the field and its terms before laying out some of the benefits, challenges, and drawbacks of large-scale work. Looking at lots of books presents an intellectual clash: the desire to know more about what we are looking at and the desire to see everything often runs up against the knowledge (and the fear) that we cannot know everything. We argue that undertaking large-scale work necessitates reflecting not only on reasons for counting, analyzing, and studying manuscripts at scale, but also on how we count and why. Methods always matter, and reflecting critically on methods matters even more when there are still foundational questions to be answered about medieval manuscripts.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Digital philology
Published
2025-03-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1353/dph.2025.a959161
Primary Topic
Big Data Technologies and Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Big Data and Manuscript Studies: An Introduction with Some Reflections on Methods

John Mattison, Hannah K. Ryley
Digital philology
Big Data Technologies and Applications
article

Big Data and Manuscript Studies: An Introduction with Some Reflections on Methods

John Mattison, Hannah K. Ryley
article en

Abstract

Abstract: This introduction considers the approaches to, reasons for, and impacts of using “big data” methods to study medieval manuscripts. This introduction to “big data” and manuscript studies offers a brief history of the field and its terms before laying out some of the benefits, challenges, and drawbacks of large-scale work. Looking at lots of books presents an intellectual clash: the desire to know more about what we are looking at and the desire to see everything often runs up against the knowledge (and the fear) that we cannot know everything. We argue that undertaking large-scale work necessitates reflecting not only on reasons for counting, analyzing, and studying manuscripts at scale, but also on how we count and why. Methods always matter, and reflecting critically on methods matters even more when there are still foundational questions to be answered about medieval manuscripts.

Digital philologyVol. 14(1)
University of Georgia (US), University of Oxford (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 91%
Big Data Technologies and Applications
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.