On Losing Middle English

Abstract: Most premodern manuscripts containing Middle English have not survived. This vast loss usefully requires scholarship to restrain its claims on various topics, such as the significance of manuscript evidence when a work survives in just one witness, and the claiming of literary-historical firsts. Survivorship bias characterizes much of Middle-English studies. Lots of lost books therefore present a research problem, one that might be tackled through several different channels: codicological and textual-critical work on absent exemplars, attention to records of lost books, and the study of patterns of loss inferred from patterns of survival. The study of loss might have other benefits in a time when quantification presents humanistic studies with challenges and opportunities, demanding interdisciplinary leaps across wide gaps. Lost evidence offers us some ways to think cautiously but also fruitfully in this scholarly moment: it helps us think about differences in the amount of data available in separate disciplines, for instance. Remembering the vast scale of loss also might help ward off a credulous attitude towards data and statistics.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Digital philology
Published
2025-03-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1353/dph.2025.a959163
Primary Topic
Linguistics and language evolution
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

On Losing Middle English

Daniel Sawyer
Digital philology
Linguistics and language evolution
article

On Losing Middle English

Daniel Sawyer
article en

Abstract

Abstract: Most premodern manuscripts containing Middle English have not survived. This vast loss usefully requires scholarship to restrain its claims on various topics, such as the significance of manuscript evidence when a work survives in just one witness, and the claiming of literary-historical firsts. Survivorship bias characterizes much of Middle-English studies. Lots of lost books therefore present a research problem, one that might be tackled through several different channels: codicological and textual-critical work on absent exemplars, attention to records of lost books, and the study of patterns of loss inferred from patterns of survival. The study of loss might have other benefits in a time when quantification presents humanistic studies with challenges and opportunities, demanding interdisciplinary leaps across wide gaps. Lost evidence offers us some ways to think cautiously but also fruitfully in this scholarly moment: it helps us think about differences in the amount of data available in separate disciplines, for instance. Remembering the vast scale of loss also might help ward off a credulous attitude towards data and statistics.

Digital philologyVol. 14(1)
Openalex Percentile: Top 89%
Linguistics and language evolution
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

On Losing Middle English — Daniel Sawyer · Digital philology (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS