Not Just “Can We?” but “Should We?” and “Why?”: Understanding Digital Manuscripts as (Big) Data

Abstract: It has been over a decade since the runaway popularity of “big data” hit industry and academia in the early 2010s. Today, big data and the artificial intelligence (AI) programs that feed on them are no longer being embraced with quite as much enthusiasm. With this growing awareness of the darker sides of (big) data and AI as its foundation, this article explores the challenges of working with datasets of digital manuscripts, particularly for those who seek to treat digital manuscripts as big data. We examine big data approaches that focus on digital manuscript images and those working with structured manuscript metadata, outlining what end-users must be aware of before plunging into the world of digital manuscripts as big data. Throughout, we emphasize the ethical and environmental costs in using machine learning and other AI approaches to analyze massive datasets of medieval manuscripts. The article concludes with a series of considerations for researchers who want to engage with digital manuscripts as (big) data.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Digital philology
Published
2025-03-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1353/dph.2025.a959170
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Digital Humanities and Scholarship
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
15.18
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Not Just “Can We?” but “Should We?” and “Why?”: Understanding Digital Manuscripts as (Big) Data

Dot Porter, Bridget Whearty
1 citations
Digital philology
Digital Humanities and Scholarship
15.18
article

Not Just “Can We?” but “Should We?” and “Why?”: Understanding Digital Manuscripts as (Big) Data

Dot Porter, Bridget Whearty
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract: It has been over a decade since the runaway popularity of “big data” hit industry and academia in the early 2010s. Today, big data and the artificial intelligence (AI) programs that feed on them are no longer being embraced with quite as much enthusiasm. With this growing awareness of the darker sides of (big) data and AI as its foundation, this article explores the challenges of working with datasets of digital manuscripts, particularly for those who seek to treat digital manuscripts as big data. We examine big data approaches that focus on digital manuscript images and those working with structured manuscript metadata, outlining what end-users must be aware of before plunging into the world of digital manuscripts as big data. Throughout, we emphasize the ethical and environmental costs in using machine learning and other AI approaches to analyze massive datasets of medieval manuscripts. The article concludes with a series of considerations for researchers who want to engage with digital manuscripts as (big) data.

Digital philologyVol. 14(1)
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Digital Humanities and Scholarship
15.18
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.