Water reuse options for decentralised MBR effluents: a case study in South Africa

ABSTRACT Treated wastewater is emerging as a promising alternative water solution. This study evaluated the feasibility of reusing effluents from three decentralised membrane bioreactor (MBR) wastewater treatment facilities in Western Cape, South Africa. Using water quality results from each facility, the technical feasibility of irrigation and both indirect potable and direct potable reuse (DPR) options for MBR effluents was evaluated. Effluents from all facilities typically meet national irrigation standards, with only one site requiring pH correction. Partially recharged groundwater with 25% of its water demand using MBR effluents requires additional treatment for organic matter, faecal coliform, nitrates, colour, saturation index, iron, and manganese parameters to meet drinking water quality upon abstraction. For DPR, MBR effluent must undergo pre-treatment to remove excess organic matter, turbidity, and suspended solids before advanced treatment with reverse osmosis. However, only one facility has economic feasibility for potable reuse with payback periods of 7 and 8 years for DPR and indirect potable reuse, respectively. Potable reuse may not be economical for small-scale MBR plants unless the necessity for drinking water reuse outweighs the financial implications. The study highlights the need for evaluating alternative low-cost technologies for MBR effluent treatment and integrated managed aquifer recharge modelling to assess various groundwater recharge scenarios.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Water Science & Technology Water Supply
Published
2025-04-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2166/ws.2025.049
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Wastewater Treatment and Reuse
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Water reuse options for decentralised MBR effluents: a case study in South Africa

John Okedi, Wasiu Babatunde Ayinde, David Ikumi, Shalongo Angula et al.
1 citations
Water Science & Technology Water Supply
Wastewater Treatment and Reuse
1.00
article

Water reuse options for decentralised MBR effluents: a case study in South Africa

John Okedi, Wasiu Babatunde Ayinde, David Ikumi, Shalongo Angula, E. H. Richards
article en
1 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT Treated wastewater is emerging as a promising alternative water solution. This study evaluated the feasibility of reusing effluents from three decentralised membrane bioreactor (MBR) wastewater treatment facilities in Western Cape, South Africa. Using water quality results from each facility, the technical feasibility of irrigation and both indirect potable and direct potable reuse (DPR) options for MBR effluents was evaluated. Effluents from all facilities typically meet national irrigation standards, with only one site requiring pH correction. Partially recharged groundwater with 25% of its water demand using MBR effluents requires additional treatment for organic matter, faecal coliform, nitrates, colour, saturation index, iron, and manganese parameters to meet drinking water quality upon abstraction. For DPR, MBR effluent must undergo pre-treatment to remove excess organic matter, turbidity, and suspended solids before advanced treatment with reverse osmosis. However, only one facility has economic feasibility for potable reuse with payback periods of 7 and 8 years for DPR and indirect potable reuse, respectively. Potable reuse may not be economical for small-scale MBR plants unless the necessity for drinking water reuse outweighs the financial implications. The study highlights the need for evaluating alternative low-cost technologies for MBR effluent treatment and integrated managed aquifer recharge modelling to assess various groundwater recharge scenarios.

Water Science & Technology Water SupplyVol. 25(6)
University of Cape Town (ZA), University of Namibia (NA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 24%
Wastewater Treatment and Reuse
1.00
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.