Measuring Fundamental Aspects of the Social Perception of Robots: Development and Validation of a Shortened Version of the RoSAS (RoSAS-SF)

Abstract The robotic social attributes scale (RoSAS) is an 18-item measure used to assess the social perception of robots (Carpinella et al. in ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction, 2017:254–262). The full scale has sound psychometric properties, but its length makes it suboptimal for use in many studies of human-robotic interaction (HRI). Here, we report the development of a shortened form of the RoSAS (the RoSAS-SF), a 6-item scale useful for assessing judgments of warmth (compassionate, social), competence (competent, reliable), and discomfort (scary, awkward) toward robots. Across two studies, the psychometric properties of the RoSAS-SF are compared with the full RoSAS using participants’ judgments of both synthetic and real images of robots. Results indicate that the RoSAS-SF yields patterns of trait inferences and effect sizes comparable to the original scale. Moreover, confirmatory factor analyses reveal that the RoSAS-SF offers acceptable model fit with a 3-factor solution. One notable finding is that the discomfort subscale showed variable reliability in capturing responses across different robot types, suggesting caution in relying upon the RoSAS-SF as an exclusive measure of this judgment dimension. Applications, advantages, and recommendations for using the RoSAS-SF in HRI research are discussed.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Social Robotics
Published
2025-04-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-025-01251-4
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Social Robot Interaction and HRI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.88
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Measuring Fundamental Aspects of the Social Perception of Robots: Development and Validation of a Shortened Version of the RoSAS (RoSAS-SF)

Grace S. R. Gillespie, A. Dash, Steven J. Stroessner, Kelsey L. Neuenswander et al.
2 citations
International Journal of Social Robotics
Social Robot Interaction and HRI
4.88
article

Measuring Fundamental Aspects of the Social Perception of Robots: Development and Validation of a Shortened Version of the RoSAS (RoSAS-SF)

Grace S. R. Gillespie, A. Dash, Steven J. Stroessner, Kelsey L. Neuenswander, Prianka D. Koya, Lin Lin
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Abstract The robotic social attributes scale (RoSAS) is an 18-item measure used to assess the social perception of robots (Carpinella et al. in ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction, 2017:254–262). The full scale has sound psychometric properties, but its length makes it suboptimal for use in many studies of human-robotic interaction (HRI). Here, we report the development of a shortened form of the RoSAS (the RoSAS-SF), a 6-item scale useful for assessing judgments of warmth (compassionate, social), competence (competent, reliable), and discomfort (scary, awkward) toward robots. Across two studies, the psychometric properties of the RoSAS-SF are compared with the full RoSAS using participants’ judgments of both synthetic and real images of robots. Results indicate that the RoSAS-SF yields patterns of trait inferences and effect sizes comparable to the original scale. Moreover, confirmatory factor analyses reveal that the RoSAS-SF offers acceptable model fit with a 3-factor solution. One notable finding is that the discomfort subscale showed variable reliability in capturing responses across different robot types, suggesting caution in relying upon the RoSAS-SF as an exclusive measure of this judgment dimension. Applications, advantages, and recommendations for using the RoSAS-SF in HRI research are discussed.

International Journal of Social RoboticsVol. 17(6)
University of California, Los Angeles (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Social Robot Interaction and HRI
4.88
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.