Knowledge, Attitude, and Practice on Digital Eye Strain Among Healthcare Students at a Private University in Northern Peninsular Malaysia

Background In this modern era, the practice of online learning and various academic assignments necessitate the use of digital device among university students. With prolonged and inappropriate use, they are prone to the risk of experiencing digital eye strain (DES). Such health conditions involve 16 predominant symptoms that might cause severe discomfort if not well treated. Since most university students still do not aware about its consequences, it is of paramount importance to deal with this issue. Objectives To investigate the knowledge, attitude, and practice (KAP) on digital eye strain (DES) among healthcare students at a private university. Materials and Methods A cross-sectional, observational, online questionnaire-based research survey analysis was conducted among healthcare students. The participants’ recruitment was conducted using convenience and a purposive sampling technique. For data analysis, various statistical tests encompassing the Chi-square test, multivariate logistic regression test, and Spearman’s correlation coefficient test were carried out. Results Our study included 350 personnel. The majority of the respondents were male ( n = 177, 50.6%), those aged 18–25 years ( n = 250, 71.4%), and pursued a Bachelor’s degree in the Faculty of Medicine and Biomedical Science ( n = 96, 27.4%). On the descriptive statistics, the overall DES prevalence was found to be 69.4% ( n = 243), in which most were moderate DES ( n = 170, 70.0%), followed by severe DES ( n = 44, 18.1%) and mild DES ( n = 29, 11.9%). The Chi-square test revealed that both the gender of respondents and the faculty of study were strongly associated with different levels of DES severity. Among the 16 DES symptoms, eye dryness ( n = 312, 89.1%) was the most commonly reported, while double vision ( n = 139, 74.7%) was the most severe or intense. In this KAP study, the knowledge level of respondents was moderate ( n = 188, 53.7%), the attitude level of most respondents was neutral ( n = 242, 69.1%), and the practice level was moderate as well ( n = 262, 74.9%). Furthermore, the duration of digital device use per day, frequency of taking breaks, seating position, and the use of blue light filters on digital devices were the associated factors of DES. Conclusion DES prevalence is high with the majority experiencing moderate DES. In addition, most respondents are equipped with a moderate knowledge level, neutral attitude level, and moderate practice levels.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Pharmacology and Pharmacotherapeutics
Published
2025-04-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/0976500x251329142
Primary Topic
Ergonomics and Musculoskeletal Disorders
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Knowledge, Attitude, and Practice on Digital Eye Strain Among Healthcare Students at a Private University in Northern Peninsular Malaysia

Lillian Hung, Sam Aaseer Thamby, Subramani Parasuraman
Journal of Pharmacology and Pharmacotherapeutics
Ergonomics and Musculoskeletal Disorders
article

Knowledge, Attitude, and Practice on Digital Eye Strain Among Healthcare Students at a Private University in Northern Peninsular Malaysia

Lillian Hung, Sam Aaseer Thamby, Subramani Parasuraman
article en

Abstract

Background In this modern era, the practice of online learning and various academic assignments necessitate the use of digital device among university students. With prolonged and inappropriate use, they are prone to the risk of experiencing digital eye strain (DES). Such health conditions involve 16 predominant symptoms that might cause severe discomfort if not well treated. Since most university students still do not aware about its consequences, it is of paramount importance to deal with this issue. Objectives To investigate the knowledge, attitude, and practice (KAP) on digital eye strain (DES) among healthcare students at a private university. Materials and Methods A cross-sectional, observational, online questionnaire-based research survey analysis was conducted among healthcare students. The participants’ recruitment was conducted using convenience and a purposive sampling technique. For data analysis, various statistical tests encompassing the Chi-square test, multivariate logistic regression test, and Spearman’s correlation coefficient test were carried out. Results Our study included 350 personnel. The majority of the respondents were male ( n = 177, 50.6%), those aged 18–25 years ( n = 250, 71.4%), and pursued a Bachelor’s degree in the Faculty of Medicine and Biomedical Science ( n = 96, 27.4%). On the descriptive statistics, the overall DES prevalence was found to be 69.4% ( n = 243), in which most were moderate DES ( n = 170, 70.0%), followed by severe DES ( n = 44, 18.1%) and mild DES ( n = 29, 11.9%). The Chi-square test revealed that both the gender of respondents and the faculty of study were strongly associated with different levels of DES severity. Among the 16 DES symptoms, eye dryness ( n = 312, 89.1%) was the most commonly reported, while double vision ( n = 139, 74.7%) was the most severe or intense. In this KAP study, the knowledge level of respondents was moderate ( n = 188, 53.7%), the attitude level of most respondents was neutral ( n = 242, 69.1%), and the practice level was moderate as well ( n = 262, 74.9%). Furthermore, the duration of digital device use per day, frequency of taking breaks, seating position, and the use of blue light filters on digital devices were the associated factors of DES. Conclusion DES prevalence is high with the majority experiencing moderate DES. In addition, most respondents are equipped with a moderate knowledge level, neutral attitude level, and moderate practice levels.

Journal of Pharmacology and PharmacotherapeuticsVol. 17(1)
AIMST University (MY)
Openalex Percentile: Top 90%
Ergonomics and Musculoskeletal Disorders
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.