Ultrasound-Guided Versus Landmark-Based Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy for Calcific Shoulder Tendinopathy: An Interventional Clinical Trial

<b>Background/Objectives</b>: Calcific tendinopathy of the shoulder is a degenerative condition characterized by calcium deposits within the rotator cuff tendons, particularly the supraspinatus. It is a frequent cause of chronic shoulder pain and functional limitation, adversely affecting quality of life. While conservative treatments such as nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), physiotherapy, and corticosteroid injections are commonly used, extracorporeal shock wave therapy (ESWT) has emerged as a promising non-invasive alternative. This interventional clinical trial compared the efficacy of ultrasound-guided versus landmark-based ESWT in treating calcific tendinopathy. <b>Methods</b>: Eighty-four patients with ultrasound-confirmed calcific tendinopathy were randomized into two groups. Group 1 received ultrasound-guided ESWT with real-time targeting of the deposit; Group 2 received landmark-based ESWT based on anatomical palpation. Both groups underwent three sessions (2000 impulses at 2.2 bars, energy level 5, 8 Hz). Clinical outcomes were assessed using the Constant-Murley score (CMS) at baseline, 12 weeks, and 6 months. Calcific deposit resorption was evaluated via ultrasound imaging. <b>Results</b>: The ultrasound-guided group showed a significant improvement in CMS from a median of 50 (range: 30-75) at baseline to 97 (52-100) at 6 months. The landmark-based group also improved, from 48 (32-74) to 79 (40-96). At 6 months post-treatment, 90.9% of patients in the ultrasound-guided group achieved successful outcomes (CMS ≥ 86), compared to 50% in the landmark-based group. Complete calcific resorption occurred in 65.9% of patients in Group 1, compared to 50% in Group 2; 15% of patients in Group 2 showed no resorption. <b>Conclusions</b>: Ultrasound-guided ESWT was significantly more effective than landmark-based ESWT in improving shoulder function, reducing pain, and promoting calcific deposit resorption. These findings support ultrasound guidance as a preferred approach for optimizing ESWT outcomes in patients with calcific tendinopathy of the shoulder.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Diagnostics
Published
2025-04-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics15091142
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Shoulder Injury and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.01
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Ultrasound-Guided Versus Landmark-Based Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy for Calcific Shoulder Tendinopathy: An Interventional Clinical Trial

Iosif Ilia, Csongor Toth, Ramona Nicoleta Suciu, Victor Niculescu et al.
1 citations
Diagnostics
Shoulder Injury and Treatment
2.01
article

Ultrasound-Guided Versus Landmark-Based Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy for Calcific Shoulder Tendinopathy: An Interventional Clinical Trial

Iosif Ilia, Csongor Toth, Ramona Nicoleta Suciu, Victor Niculescu, Gyongyi Osser, Veronica Huplea, Manuela Simona Pop, Laura Ioana Bondar, Caius Călin Miuţa, Brigitte Osser
article en
1 citations

Abstract

<b>Background/Objectives</b>: Calcific tendinopathy of the shoulder is a degenerative condition characterized by calcium deposits within the rotator cuff tendons, particularly the supraspinatus. It is a frequent cause of chronic shoulder pain and functional limitation, adversely affecting quality of life. While conservative treatments such as nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), physiotherapy, and corticosteroid injections are commonly used, extracorporeal shock wave therapy (ESWT) has emerged as a promising non-invasive alternative. This interventional clinical trial compared the efficacy of ultrasound-guided versus landmark-based ESWT in treating calcific tendinopathy. <b>Methods</b>: Eighty-four patients with ultrasound-confirmed calcific tendinopathy were randomized into two groups. Group 1 received ultrasound-guided ESWT with real-time targeting of the deposit; Group 2 received landmark-based ESWT based on anatomical palpation. Both groups underwent three sessions (2000 impulses at 2.2 bars, energy level 5, 8 Hz). Clinical outcomes were assessed using the Constant-Murley score (CMS) at baseline, 12 weeks, and 6 months. Calcific deposit resorption was evaluated via ultrasound imaging. <b>Results</b>: The ultrasound-guided group showed a significant improvement in CMS from a median of 50 (range: 30-75) at baseline to 97 (52-100) at 6 months. The landmark-based group also improved, from 48 (32-74) to 79 (40-96). At 6 months post-treatment, 90.9% of patients in the ultrasound-guided group achieved successful outcomes (CMS ≥ 86), compared to 50% in the landmark-based group. Complete calcific resorption occurred in 65.9% of patients in Group 1, compared to 50% in Group 2; 15% of patients in Group 2 showed no resorption. <b>Conclusions</b>: Ultrasound-guided ESWT was significantly more effective than landmark-based ESWT in improving shoulder function, reducing pain, and promoting calcific deposit resorption. These findings support ultrasound guidance as a preferred approach for optimizing ESWT outcomes in patients with calcific tendinopathy of the shoulder.

DiagnosticsVol. 15(9)
Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy (RO), University of Oradea (RO), Vasile Goldis Western University of Arad (RO), Aurel Vlaicu University of Arad (RO)
Openalex Percentile: Top 16%
Shoulder Injury and Treatment
2.01
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.