Urban solidarities in late modern times: Interspaces for meaningful engagement in Los Angeles and Amsterdam

Late modern urban spaces marked by heterogeneity, forced proximity, intersecting layers of difference and normalised structures of inequality and marginalisation, require rethinking the conditions for an urban ethics of solidarity. Such an ethics of solidarity needs to go beyond notions of large collective movements based on shared values or claims and beyond demarcated communities. We explore the role of personal connections centred on meaningful engagement across difference in creating reflexivity and addressing how structural inequalities affect lived experiences of marginalisation and harm. Using two empirical examples of intergroup and intragroup connectivity in contemporary late modern urban spaces (Los Angeles and Amsterdam), we show how the connections needed to address these problems can arise in interspaces for non-hierarchical engagement across difference. We argue that these interspaces, where people explore layered relations and differences, can become the basis of a new urban ethics of solidarity.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Urban Studies
Published
2025-04-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/00420980251329271
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Urban Planning and Governance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
6.18

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Urban solidarities in late modern times: Interspaces for meaningful engagement in Los Angeles and Amsterdam

T.R. Fiorito, Halleh Ghorashi, Elena Ponzoni
1 citations
Urban Studies
Urban Planning and Governance
6.18
article

Urban solidarities in late modern times: Interspaces for meaningful engagement in Los Angeles and Amsterdam

T.R. Fiorito, Halleh Ghorashi, Elena Ponzoni
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Late modern urban spaces marked by heterogeneity, forced proximity, intersecting layers of difference and normalised structures of inequality and marginalisation, require rethinking the conditions for an urban ethics of solidarity. Such an ethics of solidarity needs to go beyond notions of large collective movements based on shared values or claims and beyond demarcated communities. We explore the role of personal connections centred on meaningful engagement across difference in creating reflexivity and addressing how structural inequalities affect lived experiences of marginalisation and harm. Using two empirical examples of intergroup and intragroup connectivity in contemporary late modern urban spaces (Los Angeles and Amsterdam), we show how the connections needed to address these problems can arise in interspaces for non-hierarchical engagement across difference. We argue that these interspaces, where people explore layered relations and differences, can become the basis of a new urban ethics of solidarity.

Urban StudiesVol. 62(15)
Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam (NL)
Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Urban Planning and Governance
6.18
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Urban solidarities in late modern times: Interspaces for meaningful engagement in Los Angeles and Amsterdam — T.R. Fiorito, Halleh Ghorashi, et al. · Urban Studies (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS