ROLE OF X-RAYS AND ULTRASOUND IN DIAGNOSIS OF SMALL BOWEL OBSTRUCTION KEEPING CT-ABDOMEN AS GOLD STANDARD

Background: Small bowel obstruction (SBO) represents a significant cause of acute abdominal emergencies, necessitating timely diagnosis to prevent complications such as bowel ischemia and perforation. Although CT abdomen remains the gold standard for diagnosing SBO due to its superior diagnostic precision, the accessibility and practicality of X-rays and ultrasound in initial assessments are particularly valuable in resource-limited settings. Comparative evaluation of these modalities is essential to optimize early detection strategies and improve clinical outcomes. Objective: To evaluate the diagnostic efficacy of X-rays and ultrasound compared with CT abdomen, the gold standard, in the diagnosis of small bowel obstruction. Methods: A prospective cohort study was conducted at the Department of Radiology, PAF Hospital Islamabad, from July 2024 to December 2024. A total of 175 patients presenting with clinical symptoms suggestive of SBO were enrolled using a non-probability convenient sampling technique. Patients underwent abdominal X-rays, ultrasound, and CT scans. CT abdomen served as the reference standard for calculating sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and diagnostic accuracy of X-rays and ultrasound. Data were analyzed using SPSS version 25. Results: Compared to CT abdomen, ultrasound demonstrated a sensitivity of 93.7% (95% CI, 0.046–0.216, +OR 0.100) and a specificity of 81.0% (95% CI, 3.948–10.179, -OR 6.339), with a PPV of 56.8% and NPV of 31.8%. X-rays showed a sensitivity of 96.9% (95% CI, 0.016–0.144, +OR 0.047) and specificity of 87.0% (95% CI, 5.511–17.981, -OR 9.954), with a PPV of 58.0% and NPV of 31.0%. Conclusion: X-rays demonstrated slightly higher diagnostic accuracy than ultrasound in detecting SBO, confirming their value as an initial screening tool in emergency settings. However, CT abdomen remains indispensable for definitive diagnosis and surgical decision-making.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Insights-Journal of Health and Rehabilitation
Published
2025-04-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.71000/6fvbxz58
Primary Topic
Intestinal and Peritoneal Adhesions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

ROLE OF X-RAYS AND ULTRASOUND IN DIAGNOSIS OF SMALL BOWEL OBSTRUCTION KEEPING CT-ABDOMEN AS GOLD STANDARD

Shaista Nayyar, Sohaib Khalid, S. Toor, Auroosh Sagheer et al.
Insights-Journal of Health and Rehabilitation
Intestinal and Peritoneal Adhesions
article

ROLE OF X-RAYS AND ULTRASOUND IN DIAGNOSIS OF SMALL BOWEL OBSTRUCTION KEEPING CT-ABDOMEN AS GOLD STANDARD

Shaista Nayyar, Sohaib Khalid, S. Toor, Auroosh Sagheer, Sundas Yaseen, Shahzeb Jawwad
article en

Abstract

Background: Small bowel obstruction (SBO) represents a significant cause of acute abdominal emergencies, necessitating timely diagnosis to prevent complications such as bowel ischemia and perforation. Although CT abdomen remains the gold standard for diagnosing SBO due to its superior diagnostic precision, the accessibility and practicality of X-rays and ultrasound in initial assessments are particularly valuable in resource-limited settings. Comparative evaluation of these modalities is essential to optimize early detection strategies and improve clinical outcomes. Objective: To evaluate the diagnostic efficacy of X-rays and ultrasound compared with CT abdomen, the gold standard, in the diagnosis of small bowel obstruction. Methods: A prospective cohort study was conducted at the Department of Radiology, PAF Hospital Islamabad, from July 2024 to December 2024. A total of 175 patients presenting with clinical symptoms suggestive of SBO were enrolled using a non-probability convenient sampling technique. Patients underwent abdominal X-rays, ultrasound, and CT scans. CT abdomen served as the reference standard for calculating sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and diagnostic accuracy of X-rays and ultrasound. Data were analyzed using SPSS version 25. Results: Compared to CT abdomen, ultrasound demonstrated a sensitivity of 93.7% (95% CI, 0.046–0.216, +OR 0.100) and a specificity of 81.0% (95% CI, 3.948–10.179, -OR 6.339), with a PPV of 56.8% and NPV of 31.8%. X-rays showed a sensitivity of 96.9% (95% CI, 0.016–0.144, +OR 0.047) and specificity of 87.0% (95% CI, 5.511–17.981, -OR 9.954), with a PPV of 58.0% and NPV of 31.0%. Conclusion: X-rays demonstrated slightly higher diagnostic accuracy than ultrasound in detecting SBO, confirming their value as an initial screening tool in emergency settings. However, CT abdomen remains indispensable for definitive diagnosis and surgical decision-making.

Insights-Journal of Health and RehabilitationVol. 3(2 (Health & Rehab))
Armed Forces Institute of Pathology (PK), Foundation University Medical College (PK), Sheikh Bahaei University (IR), Pakistan Institute of Medical Sciences (PK)
Openalex Percentile: Top 84%
Intestinal and Peritoneal Adhesions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.