Using Large Language Model for Assessing Business English Students’ Pragmatic Competence

Pragmatic competence is the the ability to say and do things appropriately in various contexts. Scholars have been studied this topic from different aspects and a large quantities of methods have been attest to assess students’ pragmatic competence. However, human rating is not only laborious but also less efficient. The emergency of Artificial Intelligence (AI), particularly Large Language Model shed a light on this matter. This essay put prompts into kimi—a LLM of China to see if it can evaluate Business English major students’ pragmatic competence and compare its scoring with human rater's. It is found that LLM's core shows consistency with human score and LLM can give instant and personalized feedback which is impossible for human. Therefore, the reliability of LLM evaluation on pragmatic competence is proved.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-11-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1145/3722237.3722338
Citations
1
Primary Topic
EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.78
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Using Large Language Model for Assessing Business English Students’ Pragmatic Competence

Xin-Hua Xiang, Yi Li
1 citations
EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
2.78
article

Using Large Language Model for Assessing Business English Students’ Pragmatic Competence

Xin-Hua Xiang, Yi Li
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Pragmatic competence is the the ability to say and do things appropriately in various contexts. Scholars have been studied this topic from different aspects and a large quantities of methods have been attest to assess students’ pragmatic competence. However, human rating is not only laborious but also less efficient. The emergency of Artificial Intelligence (AI), particularly Large Language Model shed a light on this matter. This essay put prompts into kimi—a LLM of China to see if it can evaluate Business English major students’ pragmatic competence and compare its scoring with human rater's. It is found that LLM's core shows consistency with human score and LLM can give instant and personalized feedback which is impossible for human. Therefore, the reliability of LLM evaluation on pragmatic competence is proved.

Wuhan Business University (CN)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
2.78
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.