Blending de-implementation and implementation to promote adoption of universal PrEP guidelines: determinants, strategies, and outcomes

In 2021, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) proposed updated clinical practice guidelines for Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis (PrEP), marking a significant shift from risk-based screening to discussing PrEP with all sexually active adults. To ensure widespread adoption of new guidelines, this commentary posits that intentional de-implementation of the previous CDC guidelines is necessary to facilitate the adoption, implementation, and sustainment of new guidelines. Based on a review of the literature, the authors leveraged implementation science frameworks (i.e., CFIR, ERIC taxonomy, and RE-AIM) to map theoretical determinants, corresponding strategies, and outcomes in the context of de-implementing previous CDC guidelines for PrEP and simultaneously implementing the new guidelines. Potential barriers identified included resource constraints, staff capability, and structural characteristics of organizations that may impede de-implementation efforts. Potential facilitators included provider motivation and incentive systems that encourage providers to discuss PrEP with sexually active clients. Strategies like normalizing PrEP education and services, workflow redesign, and task-shifting could tackle workforce challenges. These strategies could aid in phasing out old guidelines, implementing new guidelines, increasing PrEP referrals, and reducing HIV incidence. Phasing out previous PrEP guidelines demands intentional (de-)implementation to enhance universal HIV prevention efforts and advance national plans for Ending the HIV Epidemic.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Critical Public Health
Published
2025-04-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/09581596.2025.2498714
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
12.52

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Blending de-implementation and implementation to promote adoption of universal PrEP guidelines: determinants, strategies, and outcomes

Tyler S. Bartholomew, Jahn Jaramillo, Audrey Harkness
4 citations
Critical Public Health
Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
12.52
article

Blending de-implementation and implementation to promote adoption of universal PrEP guidelines: determinants, strategies, and outcomes

Tyler S. Bartholomew, Jahn Jaramillo, Audrey Harkness
article en
4 citations

Abstract

In 2021, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) proposed updated clinical practice guidelines for Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis (PrEP), marking a significant shift from risk-based screening to discussing PrEP with all sexually active adults. To ensure widespread adoption of new guidelines, this commentary posits that intentional de-implementation of the previous CDC guidelines is necessary to facilitate the adoption, implementation, and sustainment of new guidelines. Based on a review of the literature, the authors leveraged implementation science frameworks (i.e., CFIR, ERIC taxonomy, and RE-AIM) to map theoretical determinants, corresponding strategies, and outcomes in the context of de-implementing previous CDC guidelines for PrEP and simultaneously implementing the new guidelines. Potential barriers identified included resource constraints, staff capability, and structural characteristics of organizations that may impede de-implementation efforts. Potential facilitators included provider motivation and incentive systems that encourage providers to discuss PrEP with sexually active clients. Strategies like normalizing PrEP education and services, workflow redesign, and task-shifting could tackle workforce challenges. These strategies could aid in phasing out old guidelines, implementing new guidelines, increasing PrEP referrals, and reducing HIV incidence. Phasing out previous PrEP guidelines demands intentional (de-)implementation to enhance universal HIV prevention efforts and advance national plans for Ending the HIV Epidemic.

Critical Public HealthVol. 35(1)
University of Miami (US)
National Institute of Mental Health, National Institute on Drug Abuse, National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
12.52
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Blending de-implementation and implementation to promote adoption of universal PrEP guidelines: determinants, strategies, and outcomes — Tyler S. Bartholomew, Jahn Jaramillo, et al. · Critical Public Health (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS