MON-747 Trends In Insulin Out-of-Pocket Costs And Use Disparities, 2008 To 2021

Abstract E.S. Tremblay: None. S. Argetsinger: None. F. Zhang: Research Investigator; Self; GlaxoSmithKline, Pfizer, Inc.. D. Ross-Degnan: None. J. Wharam: None. Abstract Importance: Recent insulin out-of-pocket (OOP) cost reduction policies might be inefficient in failing to target patients who demonstrate cost-related underutilization, such as low-income members and those with high-cost sharing. High deductible commercial health plans with savings options (HDHP/SO) that require high medication cost sharing have become increasingly prevalent. Objective: To assess trends in insulin OOP costs and use among commercially-insured patients from 2008-2021 and determine trends in related disparities by health plan type and income level. Design: Retrospective time series design, including data from 2008-2021. Setting: A large, national commercial health insurance database with members in all US states. Participants: Commercially-insured insulin users aged 12-64 with at least one full enrollment year. Characteristics of interest for disparities analysis included income level (low- versus high-poverty zip code) and health plan type (HDHP/SO versus non-HDHP/SO plan). Main Outcome(s) and Measure(s): Insulin OOP costs and 30-day equivalent fills per year, adjusted for age, sex, and geographical area. Results: In 2008, adjusted mean annual insulin OOP costs were $221 (95% CI, 219 to 223) per non-HDHP/SO plan member and $313 (296, 329) per HDHP/SO member, increasing to $280 (277, 283) and $496 (485, 508), respectively, by 2014. OOP costs declined to $197 (194, 200) and $424 (412, 436), respectively, by 2021. We detected no disparities in insulin use by plan type until 2014 when HDHP/SO plan members had 0.17 (0.09, 0.25) fewer adjusted annual fills than non-HDHP/SO members, a disparity that generally increased until 2019 (-0.79 fills, -0.87, -0.72) before decreasing slightly by 2021 (-0.55 fills, -0.63, -0.46). Lower-income members consistently had fewer adjusted insulin fills than higher-income members across the study period. Conclusions and Relevance: After pronounced increases in insulin OOP costs from 2008-2014, HDHP/SO plan members exhibited persistent reductions in insulin use compared with non- HDHP/SO plan members. Income-related disparities in insulin use were present throughout. Findings suggest that insulin OOP cost reduction policies would be more efficient if they targeted HDHP/SO plan members and low-income patients. Monday, June 3, 2024

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of the Endocrine Society
Published
2024-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1210/jendso/bvae163.2382
Primary Topic
Diabetes Management and Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

MON-747 Trends In Insulin Out-of-Pocket Costs And Use Disparities, 2008 To 2021

Stephanie Argetsinger, Elise Schlissel Tremblay, J. Frank Wharam, Dennis Ross‐Degnan et al.
Journal of the Endocrine Society
Diabetes Management and Research
article

MON-747 Trends In Insulin Out-of-Pocket Costs And Use Disparities, 2008 To 2021

Stephanie Argetsinger, Elise Schlissel Tremblay, J. Frank Wharam, Dennis Ross‐Degnan, Fang Zhang
article en

Abstract

Abstract E.S. Tremblay: None. S. Argetsinger: None. F. Zhang: Research Investigator; Self; GlaxoSmithKline, Pfizer, Inc.. D. Ross-Degnan: None. J. Wharam: None. Abstract Importance: Recent insulin out-of-pocket (OOP) cost reduction policies might be inefficient in failing to target patients who demonstrate cost-related underutilization, such as low-income members and those with high-cost sharing. High deductible commercial health plans with savings options (HDHP/SO) that require high medication cost sharing have become increasingly prevalent. Objective: To assess trends in insulin OOP costs and use among commercially-insured patients from 2008-2021 and determine trends in related disparities by health plan type and income level. Design: Retrospective time series design, including data from 2008-2021. Setting: A large, national commercial health insurance database with members in all US states. Participants: Commercially-insured insulin users aged 12-64 with at least one full enrollment year. Characteristics of interest for disparities analysis included income level (low- versus high-poverty zip code) and health plan type (HDHP/SO versus non-HDHP/SO plan). Main Outcome(s) and Measure(s): Insulin OOP costs and 30-day equivalent fills per year, adjusted for age, sex, and geographical area. Results: In 2008, adjusted mean annual insulin OOP costs were $221 (95% CI, 219 to 223) per non-HDHP/SO plan member and $313 (296, 329) per HDHP/SO member, increasing to $280 (277, 283) and $496 (485, 508), respectively, by 2014. OOP costs declined to $197 (194, 200) and $424 (412, 436), respectively, by 2021. We detected no disparities in insulin use by plan type until 2014 when HDHP/SO plan members had 0.17 (0.09, 0.25) fewer adjusted annual fills than non-HDHP/SO members, a disparity that generally increased until 2019 (-0.79 fills, -0.87, -0.72) before decreasing slightly by 2021 (-0.55 fills, -0.63, -0.46). Lower-income members consistently had fewer adjusted insulin fills than higher-income members across the study period. Conclusions and Relevance: After pronounced increases in insulin OOP costs from 2008-2014, HDHP/SO plan members exhibited persistent reductions in insulin use compared with non- HDHP/SO plan members. Income-related disparities in insulin use were present throughout. Findings suggest that insulin OOP cost reduction policies would be more efficient if they targeted HDHP/SO plan members and low-income patients. Monday, June 3, 2024

Journal of the Endocrine SocietyVol. 8(Supplement_1)
Boston Children's Hospital (US), Duke University (US), Harvard Pilgrim Health Care (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 59%
Diabetes Management and Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.